Marginal Adaptation of BioRoot RCS, MTA-Fillapex, EpoxySeal, and Sealapex to Radicular Dentin: An In Vitro Study

TL;DR

This study compares how well four root canal sealers stick to dentin in teeth, finding that EpoxySeal and BioRoot RCS perform best.

Contribution

The study introduces a direct comparison of four specific root canal sealers' marginal adaptation to dentin using SEM analysis.

Findings

EpoxySeal showed the best marginal adaptation (5.22±0.47), followed closely by BioRoot RCS (5.48±0.58).

Sealapex had the worst performance with a marginal adaptation of 11.64±1.35.

Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences between all groups except EpoxySeal and BioRoot RCS.

Abstract

Introduction

The primary goal of endodontic therapy is to achieve a three-dimensional filling of the root canal. The sealer plays a crucial role in filling the residual gaps between the gutta-percha and the canal wall, which prevents fluids and bacteria from entering the canal and causing complications. This study evaluates and compares the sealing ability of four root canal sealers to the root dentin.

Methods and materials

In this study, forty single-rooted mandibular premolar teeth with fully-formed apices were collected. The teeth were decoronated and instrumented. Later, the teeth were randomly divided into four groups, each comprising ten specimens, based on the sealer used for obturation. The first group was obturated with BioRoot RCS (Septodont, Septodont Holding, Paris, France), the second group with MTA-Fillapex (Angelus, Angelus Indústria de Produtos Odontológicos S/A, Brazil), the third group with EpoxySeal (Safe Endo, SafeEndo Dental India Pvt. Ltd., Gujarat, India), and the fourth group with Sealapex (Kerr, Kerr Corporation, Brea, CA). Following obturation, the teeth were sectioned vertically using a diamond disc, and the marginal adaptation of these sealers to the root dentin was assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The values were then statistically analyzed.

Results

EpoxySeal showed the maximum amount of marginal adaptation (5.22±0.47), followed by BioRoot RCS (5.48±0.58) and MTA-Fillapex (8.24±0.74), and the least amount of marginal adaptation was shown by Sealapex (11.64±1.35). Based on the analysis of variance (ANOVA), a statistically significant difference (p≤0.001) was observed. According to Tukey's post hoc test, the mean difference between all groups showed statistical significance (p≤0.05) except between BioRoot RCS and EpoxySeal.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it is concluded that EpoxySeal and BioRoot RCS exhibited superior marginal adaptation to the root dentin. BioRoot RCS can be recommended as a sealer of choice owing to its additional properties, such as antimicrobial and hydrophilic affinity during setting.

Figures