Correction: Self-reported factors associated with community ambulation after stroke: The Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
Ruth Barclay, Sandra C. Webber, Jacquie Ripat, Scott Nowicki, Robert Tate
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
The following information is missing from the Funding statement: Funding for the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) is provided by the Government of Canada through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) under grant reference: LSA 94473, and the Canada Foundation for Innovation, as well as the following provinces: Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, Alberta, and British Columbia.
The correct funding statement is: RB, SCW, and JR received funding for this study from the Endowment Fund of the College of Rehabilitation Sciences at the University of Manitoba. Funding for the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) is provided by the Government of Canada through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) under grant reference: LSA 94473, and the Canada Foundation for Innovation, as well as the following provinces: Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, Alberta, and British Columbia. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.