# How to modernize without compromising history: a case study of the Franzello Aeromedical Library's journey in updating collections, capabilities, and facilities

**Authors:** Melanie Lazarus, Theresa Bedford, Sara Craycraft, Elizabeth Irvine, Cathy Stahl, Kristen Young

PMC · DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1792 · Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2024-05-22

## TL;DR

This paper describes how the Franzello Aeromedical Library modernized its services while preserving its unique collection and mission.

## Contribution

It presents a case study of a specialized library's modernization process with actionable recommendations for similar institutions.

## Key findings

- The library successfully modernized its collection, capabilities, and facilities over two years.
- Stakeholder involvement and decision-making models were critical to the project's success.
- The modernization effort included weeding the collection and redesigning the space for collaboration.

## Abstract

Academic libraries play a significant role in the student learning process. However, student needs and preferences as well as new paradigms of learning are driving libraries to transition from quiet book repositories to places of collaboration and open information. This descriptive, mixed methods case presentation explores the transition of one library, the United States Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine Franzello Aeromedical Library, in three key areas: collection, capability, and facility. Due to the niche subject matter and audience the library serves, this case also describes how the Franzello Aeromedical Library's distinct collection and capability remained intact throughout modernization.

The Franzello Aeromedical Library's modernization project aimed to augment the library as a cutting-edge resource supporting USAFSAM's education, consultation, and research mission to equip Aerospace Medicine Airmen with the skills and knowledge for healthcare delivery in austere environments. This project was approached using five phases: 1) best practices baseline, 2) baseline evaluation of library visitor needs, 3) collection weeding, 4) capability, and 5) space design and construction.

As a result of this complex two-year project, several recommendations were gleaned. Use the effort as an opportunity to market library services to new audiences. Ensure all stakeholders are at the table from day one and in perpetuity to save time, and consider using purposeful decision-making models, such as Courses of Action, to make tough calls. Be prepared for delays by padding your timeline and compromise where necessary to keep the project alive. Finally, the authors recommend using in-project discovery and findings to plan for future need justification.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** SPACE (MESH:D008158), PHASE 2 (MESH:D000210), BASELINE EVALUATION OF LIBRARY (MESH:D000072861), water damage (MESH:D000069578), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), COLLECTION (MESH:D002292)
- **Chemicals:** FAL (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11305460/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11305460/full.md

## References

12 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11305460/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11305460