The genome sequence of the Thicket Knot-horn, Acrobasis suavella (Zincken, 1818)
Douglas Boyes, James Hammond, Sara Goodwin, Younghwan Kwak

TL;DR
This paper presents the genome sequence of the Thicket Knot-horn moth, including chromosomal scaffolding and gene annotations.
Contribution
The study provides a high-quality genome assembly and annotation for Acrobasis suavella, including chromosomal pseudomolecules and mitochondrial DNA.
Findings
The genome assembly spans 647.3 megabases and includes 30 chromosomal pseudomolecules.
The mitochondrial genome is 15.31 kilobases long and fully assembled.
Gene annotation identified 19,101 protein-coding genes using Ensembl.
Abstract
We present a genome assembly from an individual male Acrobasis suavella (the Thicket Knot-horn; Arthropoda; Insecta; Lepidoptera; Pyralidae). The genome sequence is 647.3 megabases in span. Most of the assembly is scaffolded into 30 chromosomal pseudomolecules, including the Z sex chromosome. The mitochondrial genome has also been assembled and is 15.31 kilobases in length. Gene annotation of this assembly on Ensembl identified 19,101 protein coding genes.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5| Project accession data | ||
|---|---|---|
| Assembly identifier | ilAcrSuav1.1 | |
| Species |
| |
| Specimen | ilAcrSuav1 | |
| NCBI taxonomy ID | 1857951 | |
| BioProject | PRJEB52024 | |
| BioSample ID | SAMEA10979088 | |
| Isolate information | ilAcrSuav1, male: whole organism (DNA sequencing and HiC
| |
| Assembly metrics
|
| |
| Consensus quality (QV) | 63.6 |
|
|
| 100% |
|
| BUSCO
| C:98.8%[S:98.4%,D:0.4%],
|
|
| Percentage of assembly mapped
| 99.99% |
|
| Sex chromosomes | Z chromosome |
|
| Organelles | Mitochondrial genome assembled |
|
| Raw data accessions | ||
| PacificBiosciences SEQUEL II | ERR9745002 | |
| Hi-C Illumina | ERR9503461 | |
| PolyA RNA-Seq Illumina | ERR10123692 | |
| Genome assembly | ||
| Assembly accession | GCA_943193695.1 | |
|
| GCA_943193685.1 | |
| Span (Mb) | 647.3 | |
| Number of contigs | 54 | |
| Contig N50 length (Mb) | 22.0 | |
| Number of scaffolds | 31 | |
| Scaffold N50 length (Mb) | 23.6 | |
| Longest scaffold (Mb) | 51.0 | |
| Genome annotation | ||
| Number of protein-coding genes | 19,101 | |
| Number of gene transcripts | 19,275 | |
| INSDC accession | Chromosome | Length (Mb) | GC% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28.4 | 36.5 | |
| 2 | 28.2 | 36.5 | |
| 3 | 28.13 | 36.5 | |
| 4 | 26.65 | 36.5 | |
| 5 | 26.64 | 36.5 | |
| 6 | 25.35 | 36.0 | |
| 7 | 24.43 | 36.5 | |
| 8 | 23.91 | 36.5 | |
| 9 | 23.71 | 36.5 | |
| 10 | 23.6 | 36.0 | |
| 11 | 23.58 | 36.5 | |
| 12 | 23.58 | 36.0 | |
| 13 | 23.45 | 36.5 | |
| 14 | 22.38 | 36.5 | |
| 15 | 21.95 | 36.0 | |
| 16 | 21.48 | 36.5 | |
| 17 | 21.05 | 36.5 | |
| 18 | 20.46 | 36.5 | |
| 19 | 20.43 | 37.0 | |
| 20 | 17.55 | 36.5 | |
| 21 | 16.84 | 36.5 | |
| 22 | 15.74 | 36.5 | |
| 23 | 14.92 | 37.0 | |
| 24 | 14.52 | 36.5 | |
| 25 | 13.66 | 37.0 | |
| 26 | 13.43 | 38.5 | |
| 27 | 11.18 | 37.0 | |
| 28 | 10.95 | 37.5 | |
| 29 | 10.06 | 37.0 | |
| Z | 51.0 | 36.5 | |
| MT | 0.02 | 19.5 |
| Software tool | Version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| BlobToolKit | 4.1.3 |
|
| BUSCO | 5.3.2 |
|
| Hifiasm | 0.16.1-r375 |
|
| HiGlass | 1.11.6 |
|
| Merqury | MerquryFK |
|
| MitoHiFi | 2 |
|
| PretextView | 0.2 |
|
| purge_dups | 1.2.3 |
|
| sanger-tol/genomenote | v1.0 |
|
| sanger-tol/readmapping | 1.1.0 |
|
| YaHS | yahs-1.1.91eebc2 |
|
- —Wellcome Trust
- —Wellcome Trust
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnimal Behavior and Reproduction · Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior · RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Species taxonomy
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Eumetazoa; Bilateria; Protostomia; Ecdysozoa; Panarthropoda; Arthropoda; Mandibulata; Pancrustacea; Hexapoda; Insecta; Dicondylia; Pterygota; Neoptera; Endopterygota; Amphiesmenoptera; Lepidoptera; Glossata; Neolepidoptera; Heteroneura; Ditrysia; Obtectomera; Pyraloidea; Pyralidae; Phycitinae; Acrobasis; Acrobasis suavella (Zincken, 1818) (NCBI:txid1857951).
Background
Acrobasis suavella (Zincken, 1818) is a moth of the Pyralidae family. The adult moths of this species are marked with a mixture of ruddy purple and grey on the forewings, and in some specimens the intensity of these markings can create a handsome burgundy and silver appearance to the moth. The adults of this species are on the wing in Britain and Ireland between June and August, flying at night. The adult moth is seldom seen by day but comes readily to light ( Goater et al., 1986; Parsons & Davis, 2018)
The most frequently recorded larval foodplant for the species in Britain and Ireland is Prunus spinosa, but larvae have been found on Cotoneaster, Crataegus, and Sorbus ( Parsons & Davis, 2018). The species reportedly prefers stunted and isolated P. spinosa plants, and open habitats such as downland where such plants occur ( Goater et al., 1986; Parsons & Davis, 2018). The larva feeds from September to June within a thick silken tube coated with leaf fragments and larval frass, and pupation occurs within, or adjacent to, the larval gallery ( Parsons & Davis, 2018).
In Britain, the moth is most widespread across southern England and Wales, but there is also a record from Shetland ( Langmaid & Young, 2004), possibly indicating vagrancy. Globally the species is found across Europe east to the Caucasus ( Streltzov et al., 2022), and appears to have become established in North America, around Vancouver, British Columbia, since at least the early 20th century, feeding on Cotoneaster ( Heinrich, 1939; Neunzig, 1990). It is therefore possible the species may expand its range in the future via the ornamental plants trade.
The genome of Acrobasis suavella was sequenced as part of the Darwin Tree of Life Project, a collaborative effort to sequence all named eukaryotic species in the Atlantic Archipelago of Britain and Ireland. Here we present a chromosomally complete genome sequence for Acrobasis suavella, based on one male specimen from Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire, UK.
Genome sequence report
The genome was sequenced from one male Acrobasis suavella ( Figure 1) collected from Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire, UK (51.77, –1.34). A total of 26-fold coverage in Pacific Biosciences single-molecule HiFi long reads was generated. Primary assembly contigs were scaffolded with chromosome conformation Hi-C data. Manual assembly curation corrected 7 missing joins or mis-joins and removed one haplotypic duplication, reducing the assembly length by 0.13%% and the scaffold number by 11.43%.
Photograph of the Acrobasis suavella (ilAcrSuav1) specimen used for genome sequencing.
The final assembly has a total length of 647.3 Mb in 31 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 23.6 Mb ( Table 1). Most (99.99%) of the assembly sequence was assigned to 30 chromosomal-level scaffolds, representing 29 autosomes and the Z sex chromosome. Chromosome-scale scaffolds confirmed by the Hi-C data are named in order of size ( Figure 2– Figure 5; Table 2). While not fully phased, the assembly deposited is of one haplotype. Contigs corresponding to the second haplotype have also been deposited. The mitochondrial genome was also assembled and can be found as a contig within the multifasta file of the genome submission.
Table 1.: Genome data for Acrobasis suavella, ilAcrSuav1.1.
Genome assembly of Acrobasis suavella, ilAcrSuav1.1: metrics. The BlobToolKit Snailplot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. The main plot is divided into 1,000 size-ordered bins around the circumference with each bin representing 0.1% of the 647,282,432 bp assembly. The distribution of scaffold lengths is shown in dark grey with the plot radius scaled to the longest scaffold present in the assembly (51,000,710 bp, shown in red). Orange and pale-orange arcs show the N50 and N90 scaffold lengths (23,584,496 and 14,517,006 bp), respectively. The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative scaffold count on a log scale with white scale lines showing successive orders of magnitude. The blue and pale-blue area around the outside of the plot shows the distribution of GC, AT and N percentages in the same bins as the inner plot. A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated and missing BUSCO genes in the lepidoptera_odb10 set is shown in the top right. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/ilAcrSuav1.1/dataset/CALPDP01.1/snail.
Genome assembly of Acrobasis suavella, ilAcrSuav1.1: BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot. Scaffolds are coloured by phylum. Circles are sized in proportion to scaffold length. Histograms show the distribution of scaffold length sum along each axis. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/ilAcrSuav1.1/dataset/CALPDP01.1/blob.
Genome assembly of Acrobasis suavella, ilAcrSuav1.1: BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot. The grey line shows cumulative length for all scaffolds. Coloured lines show cumulative lengths of scaffolds assigned to each phylum using the buscogenes taxrule. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/ilAcrSuav1.1/dataset/CALPDP01.1/cumulative.
Genome assembly of Acrobasis suavella, ilAcrSuav1.1: Hi-C contact map of the ilAcrSuav1.1 assembly, visualised using HiGlass. Chromosomes are shown in order of size from left to right and top to bottom. An interactive version of this figure may be viewed at https://genome-note-higlass.tol.sanger.ac.uk/l/?d=W69aQoBuSxGnPnFq02aE5Q.
Table 2.: Chromosomal pseudomolecules in the genome assembly of Acrobasis suavella, ilAcrSuav1.
The estimated Quality Value (QV) of the final assembly is 63.6 with k-mer completeness of 100%, and the assembly has a BUSCO v5.3.2 completeness of 98.8% (single = 98.4%, duplicated = 0.4%), using the lepidoptera_odb10reference set ( n = 5,286).
Metadata for specimens, spectral estimates, sequencing runs, contaminants and pre-curation assembly statistics can be found at https://links.tol.sanger.ac.uk/species/1857951.
Genome annotation report
The Acrobasis suavella genome assembly (GCA_943193695.1) was annotated using the Ensembl rapid annotation pipeline ( Table 1; https://rapid.ensembl.org/Acrobasis_suavella_GCA_943193695.1/Info/Index). The resulting annotation includes 19,275 transcribed mRNAs from 19,101 protein-coding genes.
Methods
Sample acquisition and nucleic acid extraction
Two Acrobasis suavella specimens (ilAcrSuav1 and ilAcrSuav3) were collected from Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire (biological vice-county Berkshire), UK (latitude 51.77, longitude –1.34) on 2021-07-24. The specimens were taken from a grassland habitat using a light trap. The specimens were collected and identified by Douglas Boyes (University of Oxford) and were snap-frozen on dry ice.
DNA was extracted at the Tree of Life laboratory, Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI). The ilAcrSuav1 sample was weighed and dissected on dry ice with tissue set aside for Hi-C sequencing. Whole organism tissue was disrupted using a Nippi Powermasher fitted with a BioMasher pestle. High molecular weight (HMW) DNA was extracted using the Qiagen MagAttract HMW DNA extraction kit. HMW DNA was sheared into an average fragment size of 12–20 kb in a Megaruptor 3 system with speed setting 30. Sheared DNA was purified by solid-phase reversible immobilisation using AMPure PB beads with a 1.8X ratio of beads to sample to remove the shorter fragments and concentrate the DNA sample. The concentration of the sheared and purified DNA was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer and Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit. Fragment size distribution was evaluated by running the sample on the FemtoPulse system.
RNA was extracted from whole organism tissue of ilAcrSuav3 in the Tree of Life Laboratory at the WSI using TRIzol, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was then eluted in 50 μl RNAse-free water and its concentration assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer using the Qubit RNA Broad-Range (BR) Assay kit. Analysis of the integrity of the RNA was done using Agilent RNA 6000 Pico Kit and Eukaryotic Total RNA assay.
Sequencing
Pacific Biosciences HiFi circular consensus DNA sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Poly(A) RNA-Seq libraries were constructed using the NEB Ultra II RNA Library Prep kit. DNA and RNA sequencing was performed by the Scientific Operations core at the WSI on Pacific Biosciences SEQUEL II (HiFi) and Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (RNA-Seq) instruments. Hi-C data were also generated from tissue of ilAcrSuav1 that had been set aside, using the Arima2 kit and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument.
Genome assembly, curation and evaluation
Assembly was carried out with Hifiasm ( Cheng et al., 2021) and haplotypic duplication was identified and removed with purge_dups ( Guan et al., 2020). The assembly was scaffolded with Hi-C data ( Rao et al., 2014) using YaHS ( Zhou et al., 2023). The assembly was checked for contamination as described previously ( Howe et al., 2021). Manual curation was performed using HiGlass ( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018) and Pretext ( Harry, 2022). The mitochondrial genome was assembled using MitoHiFi ( Uliano-Silva et al., 2022), which runs MitoFinder ( Allio et al., 2020) or MITOS ( Bernt et al., 2013) and uses these annotations to select the final mitochondrial contig and to ensure the general quality of the sequence.
A Hi-C map for the final assembly was produced using bwa-mem2 ( Vasimuddin et al., 2019) in the Cooler file format ( Abdennur & Mirny, 2020). To assess the assembly metrics, the k-mer completeness and QV consensus quality values were calculated in Merqury ( Rhie et al., 2020). This work was done using Nextflow ( Di Tommaso et al., 2017) DSL2 pipelines “sanger-tol/readmapping” ( Surana et al., 2023a) and “sanger-tol/genomenote” ( Surana et al., 2023b). The genome was analysed within the BlobToolKit environment ( Challis et al., 2020) and BUSCO scores ( Manni et al., 2021; Simão et al., 2015) were calculated.
Table 3 contains a list of relevant software tool versions and sources.
Genome annotation
The BRAKER2 pipeline ( Brůna et al., 2021) was used in the default protein mode to generate annotation for the Acrobasis suavella assembly (GCA_943193695.1) in Ensembl Rapid Release.
Wellcome Sanger Institute – Legal and Governance
The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner.
The submission of materials by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner is subject to the ‘Darwin Tree of Life Project Sampling Code of Practice’, which can be found in full on the Darwin Tree of Life website here. By agreeing with and signing up to the Sampling Code of Practice, the Darwin Tree of Life Partner agrees they will meet the legal and ethical requirements and standards set out within this document in respect of all samples acquired for, and supplied to, the Darwin Tree of Life Project.
Further, the Wellcome Sanger Institute employs a process whereby due diligence is carried out proportionate to the nature of the materials themselves, and the circumstances under which they have been/are to be collected and provided for use. The purpose of this is to address and mitigate any potential legal and/or ethical implications of receipt and use of the materials as part of the research project, and to ensure that in doing so we align with best practice wherever possible.
The overarching areas of consideration are:
Ethical review of provenance and sourcing of the materialLegality of collection, transfer and use (national and international)
Each transfer of samples is further undertaken according to a Research Collaboration Agreement or Material Transfer Agreement entered into by the Darwin Tree of Life Partner, Genome Research Limited (operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute), and in some circumstances other Darwin Tree of Life collaborators.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Abdennur N Mirny LA : Cooler: Scalable storage for Hi-C data and other genomically labeled arrays. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(1):311–316. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz 540 31290943 PMC 8205516 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Allio R Schomaker-Bastos A Romiguier J : Mito Finder: Efficient automated large‐scale extraction of mitogenomic data in target enrichment phylogenomics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020;20(4):892–905. 10.1111/1755-0998.13160 32243090 PMC 7497042 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Bernt M Donath A Jühling F : MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;69(2):313–9. 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023 22982435 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Brůna T Hoff KJ Lomsadze A : BRAKER 2: Automatic eukaryotic genome annotation with Gene Mark-EP+ and AUGUSTUS supported by a protein database. NAR Genom Bioinform. 2021;3(1):lqaa 108. 10.1093/nargab/lqaa 108 33575650 PMC 7787252 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Challis R Richards E Rajan J : Blob Tool Kit - interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G 3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(4):1361–1374. 10.1534/g 3.119.400908 32071071 PMC 7144090 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Cheng H Concepcion GT Feng X : Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021;18(2):170–175. 10.1038/s 41592-020-01056-5 33526886 PMC 7961889 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Di Tommaso P Chatzou M Floden EW : Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(4):316–319. 10.1038/nbt.3820 28398311 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Goater B Senior G Dyke R : British Pyralid Moths.Colchester: Harley Books,1986. Reference Source
