The genome sequence of the Feathered Ranunculus, Polymixis lichenea (Hübner, 1813)
David C. Lees, Tianzhu Xiong, Kuppusamy Sivasankaran

TL;DR
This paper provides the genome sequence of the Feathered Ranunculus, a moth species, including its chromosomes and mitochondrial DNA.
Contribution
The novel contribution is the first genome assembly of Polymixis lichenea, including chromosomal scaffolding and mitochondrial genome.
Findings
The genome assembly spans 716.7 megabases and is scaffolded into 30 chromosomal pseudomolecules.
The mitochondrial genome is 15.48 kilobases in length and has been fully assembled.
Abstract
We present a genome assembly from an individual male Polymixis lichenea (the Feathered Ranunculus; Arthropoda; Insecta; Lepidoptera; Noctuidae). The genome sequence is 716.7 megabases in span. Most of the assembly is scaffolded into 30 chromosomal pseudomolecules, including the Z sex chromosome. The mitochondrial genome has also been assembled and is 15.48 kilobases in length.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5| Project accession data | ||
|---|---|---|
| Assembly identifier | ilPolLich1.1 | |
| Species |
| |
| Specimen | ilPolLich1 | |
| NCBI taxonomy ID | 1870252 | |
| BioProject | PRJEB59081 | |
| BioSample ID | SAMEA111458575 | |
| Isolate information | ilPolLich1: male (DNA sequencing and Hi-C data) | |
| Assembly metrics
|
| |
| Consensus quality (QV) | 67.1 |
|
|
| 100% |
|
| BUSCO
| C:99.1%[S:98.6%,D:0.5%],F:0.2%,M:0.8%,n:5,286 |
|
| Percentage of assembly
| 99.94% |
|
| Sex chromosomes | Z chromosome |
|
| Organelles | Mitochondrial genome assembled |
|
| Raw data accessions | ||
| PacificBiosciences SEQUEL II | ERR10798432 | |
| Hi-C Illumina | ERR10802455 | |
| Genome assembly | ||
| Assembly accession | GCA_949091785.1 | |
|
| GCA_948532955.1 | |
| Span (Mb) | 716.7 | |
| Number of contigs | 118 | |
| Contig N50 length (Mb) | 13.7 | |
| Number of scaffolds | 40 | |
| Scaffold N50 length (Mb) | 24.4 | |
| Longest scaffold (Mb) | 59.2 | |
| INSDC accession | Chromosome | Length (Mb) | GC% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27.92 | 38.5 | |
| 2 | 26.93 | 38.5 | |
| 3 | 26.16 | 38.5 | |
| 4 | 26.14 | 38.0 | |
| 5 | 26.12 | 38.5 | |
| 6 | 26.05 | 38.5 | |
| 7 | 25.65 | 38.5 | |
| 8 | 25.52 | 38.5 | |
| 9 | 25.42 | 38.5 | |
| 10 | 24.45 | 38.5 | |
| 11 | 24.41 | 38.5 | |
| 12 | 24.36 | 38.5 | |
| 13 | 24.3 | 38.5 | |
| 14 | 24.22 | 38.5 | |
| 16 | 23.86 | 38.5 | |
| 15 | 23.86 | 38.5 | |
| 17 | 23.8 | 38.5 | |
| 18 | 23.72 | 38.5 | |
| 19 | 23.37 | 38.5 | |
| 20 | 23.09 | 38.5 | |
| 21 | 22.13 | 38.5 | |
| 22 | 20.56 | 39.0 | |
| 23 | 20.45 | 38.5 | |
| 24 | 17.82 | 39.0 | |
| 25 | 17.27 | 39.0 | |
| 26 | 16.58 | 39.5 | |
| 27 | 15.03 | 39.0 | |
| 28 | 14.52 | 39.0 | |
| 29 | 13.42 | 39.0 | |
| Z | 59.17 | 38.0 | |
| MT | 0.02 | 19.0 |
| Software tool | Version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| BlobToolKit | 4.1.5 |
|
| BUSCO | 5.3.2 |
|
| Hifiasm | 0.16.1-r375 |
|
| HiGlass | 1.11.6 |
|
| Merqury | MerquryFK |
|
| MitoHiFi | 2 |
|
| PretextView | 0.2 |
|
| purge_dups | 1.2.3 |
|
| sanger-tol/genomenote | v1.0 |
|
| sanger-tol/readmapping | 1.1.0 |
|
| YaHS | 1.2a |
|
- —Wellcome Trust
- —Wellcome Trust
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPlant and Fungal Interactions Research · Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Plant and animal studies
Species taxonomy
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Eumetazoa; Bilateria; Protostomia; Ecdysozoa; Panarthropoda; Arthropoda; Mandibulata; Pancrustacea; Hexapoda; Insecta; Dicondylia; Pterygota; Neoptera; Endopterygota; Amphiesmenoptera; Lepidoptera; Glossata; Neolepidoptera; Heteroneura; Ditrysia; Obtectomera; Noctuoidea; Noctuidae; Xyleninae; Polymixis; Polymixis lichenea (Hübner, 1813) (NCBI:txid1870252).
Background
The Feathered Ranunculus, Polymixis lichenea (Hübner, 1813) is a moderate sized noctuid moth with a wingspan of about 35–40 mm. Its forewings have a greenish tint, finely dotted with grey. The orbicular and reniform markings sometimes stand out with whitish margins or centres, as does occasionally a darker median fascia enveloping them; subterminal markings also include darker marks and other cross lines intermingle lighter and darker highlights. Local forms may be paler, darker, yellower or greener, apparently varying with substrate. Hindwings are dorsally darker in the female. The adult male, which tends to fly after midnight ( Skinner & Wilson, 2009), has pectinate antennae, as suggested by the vernacular name. The moth’s flight period is in the Palaearctic Autumn, in the UK from August to October ( Randle et al., 2019), and it overwinters as a small larva ( Waring et al., 2017).
The Feathered Ranunculus has a strong preference for coastal regions and cliffs as well as dunes, shingle and other sparsely vegetated habitats ( Waring et al., 2017). The larva feeds on various low growing plants such as Biting Stonecrop ( Sedum acre), Thrift ( Armeria maritima), Ragwort ( Senecio jacobaeae), Rumex spp., Hoary Cress ( Cardaria draba), and Brassica oleracea ( Skinner & Wilson, 2009), but newly emerged larvae can be very fussy and will accept grass ( Leverton, 2001). The adult nectars on ivy blossom ( Skinner & Wilson, 2009).
P. lichenea is distributed towards coasts locally in the Western Palaearctic only, but absent in western Ireland and most of northern Britain ( Randle et al., 2019), and ranges from north-east Ireland to the northern Baltic, Spain and Southern France but missing in central Europe and Scandinavia, with records in the Canaries and north-west Africa: Morocco ( GBIF Secretariat, 2022).
Populations in the UK have declined by 39% in abundance between 1970 and 2016 and by 21% in distribution ( Randle et al., 2019). Between 1968 and 2006 Rothamsted trap numbers declined annually by an average of about 0.7% ( Conrad et al., 2006).
P. lichenea exhibits a single mitochondrial cluster on BOLD, BOLD:AAH7735 (24/08/2023) with UK populations closer to those of Norway than the Mediterranean ones which are up to 1.38% divergent from them (maximum intraspecific divergence 1.77%). Several near neighbours of P. lichenea on BOLD belonging to different genera include species of Mniotype Franclemont, 1941, Fishia Grote, 1877 and Dryotype Hampson, 1906, whilst Polymixis polymita (Linnaeus, 1761) (the type species of Polymixis Hübner, [1820]) is at least 6.27% pairwise divergent to it in COI-5P (24/08/2023). Polymixis is a member of the noctuine tribe Xylenini, and ( Fibiger et al., 2001) place P. lichenea in the subgenus Eumichtis Hübner, 1821. Resolving the phylogenetic relationships of Polymixis will require multiple loci, which the genome sequence presented here will help to provide.
Genome sequence report
The genome was sequenced from one male Polymixis lichenea ( Figure 1) collected from Restharrow Dunes National Nature Reserve, England, UK (51.27, 1.38). A total of 40-fold coverage in Pacific Biosciences single-molecule HiFi long reads was generated. Primary assembly contigs were scaffolded with chromosome conformation Hi-C data. Manual assembly curation corrected nine missing joins or mis-joins and removed two haplotypic duplications, reducing the scaffold number by 4.65%.
Photograph of the Polymixis lichenea (ilPolLich1) specimen used for genome sequencing.
The final assembly has a total length of 716.7 Mb in 40 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 24.4 Mb ( Table 1). Most (99.94%) of the assembly sequence was assigned to 30 chromosomal-level scaffolds, representing 29 autosomes and the Z sex chromosome. Chromosome-scale scaffolds confirmed by the Hi-C data are named in order of size ( Figure 2– Figure 5; Table 2). Z chromosome identified based on synteny with Fissipunctia ypsillon (GCA_947568875.1) and Dryobota labecula (GCA_947523025.1). While not fully phased, the assembly deposited is of one haplotype. Contigs corresponding to the second haplotype have also been deposited. The mitochondrial genome was also assembled and can be found as a contig within the multifasta file of the genome submission.
Table 1.: Genome data for Polymixis lichenea, ilPolLich1.1.
Genome assembly of Polymixis lichenea, ilPolLich1.1: metrics.The BlobToolKit Snailplot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. The main plot is divided into 1,000 size-ordered bins around the circumference with each bin representing 0.1% of the 716,694,765 bp assembly. The distribution of scaffold lengths is shown in dark grey with the plot radius scaled to the longest scaffold present in the assembly (59,173,276 bp, shown in red). Orange and pale-orange arcs show the N50 and N90 scaffold lengths (24,363,533 and 17,269,570 bp), respectively. The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative scaffold count on a log scale with white scale lines showing successive orders of magnitude. The blue and pale-blue area around the outside of the plot shows the distribution of GC, AT and N percentages in the same bins as the inner plot. A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated and missing BUSCO genes in the lepidoptera_odb10 set is shown in the top right. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/ilPolLich1.1/dataset/CARWXJ01/snail.
Genome assembly of Polymixis lichenea, ilPolLich1.1: BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot.Scaffolds are coloured by phylum. Circles are sized in proportion to scaffold length. Histograms show the distribution of scaffold length sum along each axis. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/ilPolLich1.1/dataset/CARWXJ01/blob.
Genome assembly of Polymixis lichenea, ilPolLich1.1: BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot.The grey line shows cumulative length for all scaffolds. Coloured lines show cumulative lengths of scaffolds assigned to each phylum using the buscogenes taxrule. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/ilPolLich1.1/dataset/CARWXJ01/cumulative.
Genome assembly of Polymixis lichenea, ilPolLich1.1: Hi-C contact map of the ilPolLich1.1 assembly, visualised using HiGlass.Chromosomes are shown in order of size from left to right and top to bottom. An interactive version of this figure may be viewed at https://genome-note-higlass.tol.sanger.ac.uk/l/?d=W7Awu15tSs2lO-z-wTKsJA.
Table 2.: Chromosomal pseudomolecules in the genome assembly of Polymixis lichenea, ilPolLich1.
The estimated Quality Value (QV) of the final assembly is 67.1 with k-mer completeness of 100%, and the assembly has a BUSCO v5.3.2 completeness of 99.1% (single = 98.6%, duplicated = 0.5%), using the lepidoptera_odb10 reference set ( n = 5,286).
Metadata for specimens, spectral estimates, sequencing runs, contaminants and pre-curation assembly statistics can be found at https://links.tol.sanger.ac.uk/species/1870252.
Methods
Sample acquisition and nucleic acid extraction
A male Polymixis lichenea (specimen ID NHMUK013698282, individual ilPolLich1) was collected from Restharrow Dunes National Nature Reserve, England, UK (latitude 51.27, longitude 1.38) on 2021-09-24. The specimen was collected and identified by David Lees (Natural History Museum) and dry frozen at –80°C.
The ilPolLich1 sample was prepared for DNA extraction at the Tree of Life laboratory, Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI). The sample weighed and dissected on dry ice with tissue set aside for Hi-C sequencing. Head and thorax tissue was cryogenically disrupted to a fine powder using a Covaris cryoPREP Automated Dry Pulveriser, receiving multiple impacts. DNA was extracted at the WSI Scientific Operations core using the Qiagen MagAttract HMW DNA kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Sequencing
Pacific Biosciences HiFi circular consensus DNA sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. DNA sequencing was performed by the Scientific Operations core at the WSI on a Pacific Biosciences SEQUEL II (HiFi) instrument. Hi-C data were also generated from remaining tissue of ilPolLich1 using the Arima2 kit and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument.
Genome assembly, curation and evaluation
Assembly was carried out with Hifiasm ( Cheng et al., 2021) and haplotypic duplication was identified and removed with purge_dups ( Guan et al., 2020). The assembly was then scaffolded with Hi-C data ( Rao et al., 2014) using YaHS ( Zhou et al., 2023). The assembly was checked for contamination and corrected as described previously ( Howe et al., 2021). Manual curation was performed using HiGlass ( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018) and Pretext ( Harry, 2022). The mitochondrial genome was assembled using MitoHiFi ( Uliano-Silva et al., 2023), which runs MitoFinder ( Allio et al., 2020) or MITOS ( Bernt et al., 2013) and uses these annotations to select the final mitochondrial contig and to ensure the general quality of the sequence.
A Hi-C map for the final assembly was produced using bwa-mem2 ( Vasimuddin et al., 2019) in the Cooler file format ( Abdennur & Mirny, 2020). To assess the assembly metrics, the k-mer completeness and QV consensus quality values were calculated in Merqury ( Rhie et al., 2020). This work was done using Nextflow ( Di Tommaso et al., 2017) DSL2 pipelines “sanger-tol/readmapping” ( Surana et al., 2023a) and “sanger-tol/genomenote” ( Surana et al., 2023b). The genome was analysed within the BlobToolKit environment ( Challis et al., 2020) and BUSCO scores ( Manni et al., 2021; Simão et al., 2015) were calculated.
Table 3 contains a list of relevant software tool versions and sources.
Wellcome Sanger Institute – Legal and Governance
The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner. The submission of materials by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner is subject to the ‘Darwin Tree of Life Project Sampling Code of Practice’, which can be found in full on the Darwin Tree of Life website here. By agreeing with and signing up to the Sampling Code of Practice, the Darwin Tree of Life Partner agrees they will meet the legal and ethical requirements and standards set out within this document in respect of all samples acquired for, and supplied to, the Darwin Tree of Life Project.
Further, the Wellcome Sanger Institute employs a process whereby due diligence is carried out proportionate to the nature of the materials themselves, and the circumstances under which they have been/are to be collected and provided for use. The purpose of this is to address and mitigate any potential legal and/or ethical implications of receipt and use of the materials as part of the research project, and to ensure that in doing so we align with best practice wherever possible. The overarching areas of consideration are:
• Ethical review of provenance and sourcing of the material
• Legality of collection, transfer and use (national and international)
Each transfer of samples is further undertaken according to a Research Collaboration Agreement or Material Transfer Agreement entered into by the Darwin Tree of Life Partner, Genome Research Limited (operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute), and in some circumstances other Darwin Tree of Life collaborators.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Abdennur N Mirny LA : Cooler: Scalable storage for Hi-C data and other genomically labeled arrays. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(1):311–316. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz 540 31290943 PMC 8205516 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Allio R Schomaker‐Bastos A Romiguier J : Mito Finder: Efficient automated large‐scale extraction of mitogenomic data in target enrichment phylogenomics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020;20(4):892–905. 10.1111/1755-0998.13160 32243090 PMC 7497042 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Bernt M Donath A Jühling F : MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;69(2):313–319. 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023 22982435 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Challis R Richards E Rajan J : Blob Tool Kit - interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G 3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(4):1361–1374. 10.1534/g 3.119.400908 32071071 PMC 7144090 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Cheng H Concepcion GT Feng X : Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021;18(2):170–175. 10.1038/s 41592-020-01056-5 33526886 PMC 7961889 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Conrad KF Warren M Fox R : Rapid declines of common, widespread British moths provide evidence of an insect biodiversity crisis. Biological Conservation. 2006;132(3):279–291. 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.020 · doi ↗
- 7Di Tommaso P Chatzou M Floden EW : Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(4):316–319. 10.1038/nbt.3820 28398311 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Fibiger M Ronkay L Yela J : Hadeninae II. Noctuidae Europaeae. Entomological Press, Sorø,2001;5:452.
