Correction: Responsiveness of the patient-specific Canadian occupational performance measure and a fixed-items activity limitations measure in patients with dupuytren disease
Anna Lauritzson, David Eckerdal, Isam Atroshi
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDupuytren's Contracture and Treatments · Nail Diseases and Treatments · Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Correction to: Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 7,** 38 (2023)**
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00579-7
Following publication of the original article it was reported that there was a recurring typographical error where ‘6-fold’ was written instead of ‘4-fold’ in three instances, as listed below with the corrected text in bold:
In the Abstract, the Conclusion section should read: The COPM had about 4-fold larger responsiveness than the QuickDASH, which supports use of an individualized measure when assessing treatment effects in Dupuytren disease.
The first sentence of the Discussion section should read: This study showed that the COPM, a patient-specific measure of activity limitations, had a much higher responsiveness (about 4-fold as measured with Cohen’s d) than the fixed-items QuickDASH.
The article Conclusion should read: The COPM had 4-fold larger responsiveness than the QuickDASH. This supports the use of an individualized measure when assessing treatment effects in DD.
The original article has been updated.