# Comparison of the Magnesium Sulphate With Paracetamol Combination vs the Fentanyl With Lignocaine Combination in Attenuating the Hemodynamic Response During Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Prospective, Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study

**Authors:** Nandhakumar Murugesan, Amoolya Kamalnath, R V Ranjan, Sivakumar Segaran

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66241 · Cureus · 2024-08-05

## TL;DR

This study compares two drug combinations to see which is better at reducing heart rate and blood pressure changes during a medical procedure called laryngoscopy and intubation.

## Contribution

The study provides a direct comparison of magnesium sulphate with paracetamol versus fentanyl with lignocaine for hemodynamic control during intubation.

## Key findings

- Both drug combinations were equally effective in attenuating hemodynamic responses during laryngoscopy and intubation.
- No statistically significant differences were observed in heart rate or blood pressure changes between the two groups.
- Percentage changes in hemodynamic parameters remained within 15% of baseline values in both groups.

## Abstract

Background and aims

Laryngoscopy and intubation cause an increased sympatho-adrenergic pressor response, which can be detrimental to patients with coronary artery disease, hypertension, etc. Various drugs and manoeuvres have been tried to reduce the pressor response with acceptable results but the quest for the ideal drug still continues. Hence, we planned to compare the effects of magnesium sulfate with paracetamol and fentanyl with lignocaine on attenuating the hemodynamic responses due to direct laryngoscopy and intubation and to note the complications of these drugs.

Methods

We studied 60 adult patients of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II of either sex, scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group A received 25 mg/kg magnesium sulphate mixed with paracetamol 1 gram IV (100 ml) given over 10 minutes before induction and Group B received 2 mcg/kg fentanyl and 1.5 mg/kg lignocaine, 3 minutes before intubation. All patients were uniformly pre-medicated, induced, and intubated as per standard protocol. Heart rate (HR) and systemic arterial pressures were recorded at baseline, after study drug infusion, after induction, and 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 mins after intubation. Hemodynamic parameters were compared using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). In the post-hoc tests, p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

We observed the mean pre-op HR (p = 0.161) and mean HR one-minute post-induction (p = 0.144). The percentage change from baseline at one-minute post-induction was 9.7 in Group A and 15.2 in Group B. We observed the mean pre-op mean arterial pressure (MAP) (p = 0.119) and mean MAP one minute post-induction (p = 0.585). The percentage change from baseline at one-minute post-induction was 3.3 in Group A and 2.8 in Group B. The percentage change from baseline was found to be within 15%, for HR in Group A and for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and MAP in Group B. However, there was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) between the mean HR, SBP, DBP, and MAP between the time points.

Conclusion

In our study, both the combinations of drugs, magnesium sulphate with paracetamol (Group A drugs) and fentanyl with lignocaine (Group B drugs) were found to be equally effective (i.e. neither group was superior to the other) in attenuating the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** magnesium sulphate (PubChem CID 24083), paracetamol (PubChem CID 1983), fentanyl (PubChem CID 3345), lignocaine (PubChem CID 3676)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** coronary artery disease (MESH:D003324), hypertension (MESH:D006973)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11302484/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11302484/full.md

## References

22 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11302484/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11302484