Outstanding Reviewers for Nanoscale Advances in 2023
TL;DR
The paper recognizes outstanding reviewers who contributed to the quality of Nanoscale Advances in 2023.
Contribution
The paper highlights exceptional peer reviewers for their contributions to the journal in 2023.
Findings
Outstanding reviewers were selected by the editorial team for their significant contributions.
The paper acknowledges the role of reviewers in maintaining the quality of chemical science literature.
Abstract
We would like to take this opportunity to thank all of Nanoscale Advances' reviewers for helping to preserve quality and integrity in chemical science literature. We would also like to highlight the Outstanding Reviewers for Nanoscale Advances in 2023. We would like to take this opportunity to highlight the Outstanding Reviewers for Nanoscale Advances in 2023, as selected by the editorial team for their significant contribution to the journal.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis
Each one of our outstanding peer reviewers has been carefully selected by our editorial team and includes active researchers who have made significant contributions to peer review and have gone above and beyond in their actions.
We announce our Outstanding Reviewers annually and each receives a certificate to give recognition for their contribution. The reviewers have been chosen based on the number, timeliness and quality of the reports completed during 2023.
“Keep up the good work. Outstanding Reviewer Awards are given by the editors of Nanoscale Advances to scientists who provided constructive, benevolent, and punctual reviews during the previous year. I personally want to add my thanks to these Outstanding Reviewers and also thank everyone who has reviewed manuscripts for Nanoscale Advances.” – Professor Dirk Guldi, Editor-in-Chief.
“High-quality peer-review, to a great extent, bridges the gap between initial manuscript level and journal's publication standard, paving the way towards better content presentation and fresh knowledge spread for world-wide research communities. Therefore, we're very delighted to recognize the Nanoscale Advances Outstanding Reviewers who have devoted continuous effort on manuscript review. Without their excellent professionalism and dedicated attitude, this journal's publications cannot be elevated. With concerted effort from all sides, we're bound to make greater progress and generate more novel academic ideas on this promising open-access platform.” – Professor Yue Zhang, Editor-in-chief
Dr Nikhil Bhalla
Ulster University
ORCID: 0000-0002-4720-3679
Dr Minju Kim
National University of Singapore
ORCID: 0000-0002-0962-2661
Dr Bo Li
Kennesaw State University
ORCID: 0000-0001-9407-9503
Professor Junsuk Rho
Pohang University of Science and Technology
ORCID: 0000-0002-2179-2890
Professor Hui Wang
University of South Carolina
ORCID: 0000-0002-1874-5137
Dr Hui Xu
Nanjing Tech University
ORCID: 0000-0002-9232-9625
We would also like to thank the Nanoscale Advances Editorial Board and Advisory Board and the nanoscience community for their continued support of the journal, as authors, reviewers and readers.
We continue to work on improving the diversity of our reviewer pool to reflect the diversity of the communities that we serve.
Dirk Guldi, Editor-in-chief
Yue Zhang, Editor-in-chief
Jeremy Allen, Executive Editor