# Assessing the human factors involved in chest compression with superimposed sustained inflation during neonatal and paediatric resuscitation: A randomized crossover study

**Authors:** Chelsea M.D. Morin, Brenda H.Y. Law, Jonathan P. Duff, Georg M. Schmölzer

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100721 · Resuscitation Plus · 2024-07-17

## TL;DR

This study compares a new CPR technique with standard methods in terms of physical, cognitive, and team demands during neonatal and pediatric resuscitation.

## Contribution

The study introduces and evaluates a new CPR technique (CC + SI) for neonatal and pediatric use, focusing on human factors.

## Key findings

- CC + SI was not more physically or cognitively demanding than standard CPR.
- Team performance was similar between CC + SI and standard CPR.
- Participants found CC + SI simpler and better for role transitions and communication.

## Abstract

A new cardiopulmonary resuscitation technique, chest compressions with sustained inflation (CC + SI) might be an alternative to both the neonatal [3:1compressions to ventilations (3:1C:V)] and paediatric [chest compression with asynchronous ventilation (CCaV)] approaches. The human factors associated with this technique are unknown. We aimed to compare the physical, cognitive, and team-based human factors for CC + SI to standard CPR (3:1C:V or CCaV).

Randomized crossover simulation study including 40 participants on 20 two-person teams. Workload [National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX)], crisis resource management skills (CRM) [Ottawa Global Rating Scale (OGRS)], and debrief analysis were compared.

There was no difference in paired NASA-TLX scores for any dimension between the CC + SI and standard, adjusting for CPR order. There was no difference in CRM scores for CC + SI compared to standard. Participants were less familiar with CC + SI although many found it simpler to perform, better for transitions/switching roles, and better for communication.

The human factors are no more physically or cognitively demanding with CC + SI compared to standard CPR (NASA-TLX and participant debrief) and team performance was no different with CC + SI compared to standard CPR (OGRS score).

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11301379/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11301379/full.md

## References

18 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11301379/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11301379