# Understanding Barriers to Guideline-Concordant Treatment in Foregut Cancer: From Data to Solutions

**Authors:** Annabelle L. Fonseca, Rida Ahmad, Krisha Amin, Manish Tripathi, Ahmed Abdalla, Larry Hearld, Smita Bhatia, Martin J. Heslin

PMC · DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15627-9 · Annals of Surgical Oncology · 2024-07-02

## TL;DR

This study identifies barriers to guideline-concordant treatment in foregut cancer patients and suggests solutions to improve treatment adherence.

## Contribution

The study uses root cause analysis to identify specific barriers to guideline-concordant treatment in foregut cancers.

## Key findings

- 34% of patients did not receive guideline-concordant treatment.
- Barriers included patient, physician, and institutional factors like incomplete therapy and delays in care.
- Solutions include automated follow-up systems and structured prehabilitation programs.

## Abstract

A large proportion of patients with foregut cancers do not receive guideline-concordant treatment (GCT). This study sought to understand underlying barriers to GCT through a root cause analysis approach.

A single-institution retrospective review of 498 patients with foregut (gastric, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary) adenocarcinoma from 2018 to 2022 was performed. Guideline-concordant treatment was defined based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. The Ishikawa cause and effect model was used to establish main contributing factors to non-GCT.

Overall, 34% did not receive GCT. Root causes of non-GCT included Patient, Physician, Institutional Environment and Broader System-related factors. In decreasing order of frequency, the following contributed to non-GCT: receipt of incomplete therapy (N = 28, 16.5%), deconditioning on chemotherapy (N = 26, 15.3%), delays in care because of patient resource constraints followed by loss to follow-up (N = 19, 11.2%), physician factors (N = 19, 11.2%), no documentation of treatment plan after referral to oncologic expertise (N = 19, 11.2%), loss to follow-up before oncology referral (N = 17, 10%), nonreferral to medical oncologic expertise (N = 16, 9.4%), nonreferral to surgical oncology in patients with resectable disease (N = 15, 8.8%), and complications preventing completion of treatment (N = 11, 6.5%). Non-GCT often was a function of multiple intersecting patient, physician, and institutional factors.

A substantial percentage of patients with foregut cancer do not receive GCT. Solutions that may improve receipt of GCT include development of automated systems to improve patient follow-up; institutional prioritization of resources to enhance staffing; financial counseling and assistance programs; and development and integration of structured prehabilitation programs into cancer treatment pathways.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-024-15627-9.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** gastric adenocarcinoma (MONDO:0005036), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MONDO:0006047)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** foregut (gastric, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary) adenocarcinoma (MESH:D013274), Non-GCT (MESH:D016609), Cancer (MESH:D009369)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11300473/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11300473/full.md

## References

3 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11300473/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11300473