# Reexamining the Kuleshov effect: Behavioral and neural evidence from authentic film experiments

**Authors:** Zhengcao Cao, Yashu Wang, Liangyu Wu, Yapei Xie, Zhichen Shi, Yiren Zhong, Yiwen Wang, Michael B. Steinborn, Michael B. Steinborn, Michael B. Steinborn, Michael B. Steinborn, Michael B. Steinborn

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308295 · PLOS ONE · 2024-08-05

## TL;DR

This study confirms the Kuleshov effect using real films, showing that editing influences how viewers perceive emotions on neutral faces, both behaviorally and in the brain.

## Contribution

The study provides empirical evidence of the Kuleshov effect using authentic film sequences and identifies specific neural correlates.

## Key findings

- Fearful or happy scenes influence the perceived emotion of neutral faces in authentic film sequences.
- Neural correlates of the Kuleshov effect include the cuneus, precuneus, and other brain regions.
- The Kuleshov effect is confirmed both behaviorally and through fMRI measurements.

## Abstract

Film cognition explores the influence of cinematic elements, such as editing and film color, on viewers’ perception. The Kuleshov effect, a famous example of how editing influences viewers’ emotional perception, was initially proposed to support montage theory through the Kuleshov experiment. This effect, which has since been recognized as a manifestation of point-of-view (POV) editing practices, posits that the emotional interpretation of neutral facial expressions is influenced by the accompanying emotional scene in a face-scene-face sequence. However, concerns persist regarding the validity of previous studies, often employing inauthentic film materials like static images, leaving the question of its existence in authentic films unanswered. This study addresses these concerns by utilizing authentic films in two experiments. In Experiment 1, multiple film clips were captured under the guidance of a professional film director and seamlessly integrated into authentic film sequences. 59 participants viewed these face-scene-face film sequences and were tasked with rating the valence and emotional intensity of neutral faces. The findings revealed that the accompanying fearful or happy scenes significantly influence the interpretation of emotion on neutral faces, eliciting perceptions of negative or positive emotions from the neutral face. These results affirm the existence of the Kuleshov effect within authentic films. In Experiment 2, 31 participants rated the valence and arousal of neutral faces while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The behavioral results confirm the Kuleshov effect in the MRI scanner, while the neural data identify neural correlates that support its existence at the neural level. These correlates include the cuneus, precuneus, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, post cingulate gyrus, orbitofrontal cortex, fusiform gyrus, and insula. These findings also underscore the contextual framing inherent in the Kuleshov effect. Overall, the study integrates film theory and cognitive neuroscience experiments, providing robust evidence supporting the existence of the Kuleshov effect through both subjective ratings and objective neuroimaging measurements. This research also contributes to a deeper understanding of the impact of film editing on viewers’ emotional perception from the contemporary POV editing practices and neurocinematic perspective, advancing the knowledge of film cognition.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** eye blinking (MESH:D000092164), Kuleshov effect (MESH:D065606), fMRI (MESH:C564543), tremors (MESH:D014202), auditory Kuleshov effect (MESH:D006311), panic disorder (MESH:D016584)
- **Chemicals:** EPS (MESH:C100219), oxygen (MESH:D010100), 41138R1Reexamining (-)
- **Species:** Mus musculus (house mouse, species) [taxon 10090], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]
- **Cell lines:** S2 — Drosophila melanogaster (Fruit fly), Spontaneously immortalized cell line (CVCL_Z232)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11299807/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11299807/full.md

## References

69 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11299807/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11299807