# When ‘Best’ Practice Isn’t…

**Authors:** Gabrielle M. Finn, Megan E. L. Brown

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s40670-024-02048-2 · Medical Science Educator · 2024-05-18

## TL;DR

The paper questions the idea of 'best practice' in medical education by arguing that what is considered best depends heavily on context.

## Contribution

It introduces a critical perspective on the concept of 'best practice', emphasizing the importance of context in medical education.

## Key findings

- The term 'best' in medical education lacks consideration for specific contexts.
- Context significantly influences what constitutes effective practice.
- Universal standards may not apply equally across different situations.

## Abstract

Best, is to be ‘of the highest quality, or being the most suitable, pleasing, or effective type of thing or person’. Within medical education, 'best-ness' is evident within best practice guides and recommendations, and within research, where best evidence influences design and conduct. Yet, much of the evidence of best-ness fails to consider best for who and where, what, and when. Thinking needs reframing, given that “best-ness” and medical education are such good bedfellows, but it is critical that we recognise the impact and influence of context — that practice can be good, but cannot be universally and unflinchingly best.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11296974/full.md

## References

1 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11296974/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11296974