# Insights Into the Research Landscape of Biomedical Physics: A Bibliometric Inquiry

## TL;DR

This study maps the research landscape of biomedical physics using bibliometric analysis to identify trends, key researchers, and future directions.

## Contribution

The study provides a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of biomedical physics, revealing thematic trends and collaboration networks.

## Key findings

- Annual scientific production in biomedical physics shows growth trends and identifies influential authors.
- Thematic analysis reveals evolving research topics and the conceptual structure of the field.
- Co-citation analysis highlights key authors and global research collaboration networks.

## Abstract

Biomedical physics is the interdisciplinary field that links the scientific concepts in physics to the practice of medicine and biology, in an effort to understand biological processes, help in the development of medical technologies, to improve human health. This bibliometric study investigates the interdisciplinary field of biomedical physics, which integrates the principles of physics with biological and medical sciences to develop innovative diagnostic and therapeutic technologies. Utilizing the Web of Science database for bibliographic data collection, the analysis employs advanced bibliometric software tools, including Biblioshiny and VOSviewer, to comprehensively map the research landscape. Our findings delineate the annual scientific production, highlighting growth trends and identifying the most influential authors and key publication venues in the field. A thematic analysis reveals prevailing research topics and the evolution of scientific interests over time, providing insights into the shifting focus areas within biomedical physics. The factorial analysis goes further to clarify the conceptual structure of the discipline by providing a topological image of how the different research areas are involved. It helps to recognize topical fields and the possibility of the topicalization of other subjects. Keyword co-occurrence assumes the leading themes and measures the value of the topology. Meanwhile, bibliographical information defines the authors’ network, and co-citation analysis identifies the critical authors’ pool. The last points to the topic dependence and the network of research collaboration on a global scale. As a result, a survey identifies the deficits and rules of recommendations for the further development of research. It adds practical implications that are necessary for the development and identifies influences for popularization that it might have in the future.