The complex effects of modern oncogenic environments on the fitness, evolution and conservation of wildlife species

TL;DR

Human activities are increasing cancer rates in wildlife, challenging their survival and evolution due to outdated cancer defenses.

Contribution

Highlights the complex biological and evolutionary impacts of modern oncogenic risks on wildlife conservation.

Findings

Increased anti-cancer defenses lead to energy costs and health issues like autoimmune diseases.

Cancer affects fitness traits such as predator evasion and dispersal capacity.

Early reproduction may evolve as a response to cancer risks, but it has sustainability limits.

Abstract

Growing evidence indicates that human activities are causing cancer rates to rise in both human and wildlife populations. This is due to the inability of ancestral anti‐cancer defences to cope with modern environmental risks. The evolutionary mismatch between modern oncogenic risks and evolved cancer defences has far‐reaching effects on various biological aspects at different timeframes, demanding a comprehensive study of the biology and evolutionary ecology of the affected species. Firstly, the increased activation of anti‐cancer defences leads to excessive energy expenditure, affecting other biological functions and potentially causing health issues like autoimmune diseases. Secondly, tumorigenesis itself can impact important fitness‐related parameters such as competitiveness, predator evasion, resistance to parasites, and dispersal capacity. Thirdly, rising cancer risks can influence the species' life‐history traits, often favoring early reproduction to offset fitness costs associated with cancer. However, this strategy has its limits, and it may not ensure the sustainability of the species if cancer risks continue to rise. Lastly, some species may evolve additional anti‐cancer defences, with uncertain consequences for their biology and future evolutionary path. In summary, we argue that the effects of increased exposure to cancer‐causing substances on wildlife are complex, ranging from immediate responses to long‐term evolutionary changes. Understanding these processes, especially in the context of conservation biology, is urgently needed.

Figures