Protocol for a cluster randomized study to compare the effectiveness of a self-report distress tool and a mental health referral service to usual case management on program completion among vulnerable youth enrolled in a vocational training program
Shawna Bailey, Carrie Stoner, Kelly Cruise, Giulio DiDiodato, Andrew Max Abaasa, Andrew Max Abaasa

TL;DR
This study compares two mental health interventions to usual care in helping vulnerable youth complete vocational training and find employment.
Contribution
A novel cluster randomized trial design to evaluate mental health support in vocational training for vulnerable youth.
Findings
The study will assess program attendance and completion rates across four intervention groups.
Post-program employment outcomes will be evaluated over a 24-month follow-up period.
Cluster randomization will ensure balanced group allocation across training cohorts.
Abstract
1) To compare the effect of the self-report distress tool (DT) and rapid mental health referral process (MH) on vocational training program attendance. 2) To compare the effect of the DT and MH on vocational training program completion. 3) To compare the effect of the DT an MH on post-vocational training program employment. Pragmatic, multi-centre, 2x2 factorial, cluster randomized, superiority study with 4 parallel groups and primary endpoints of vocational program attendance and completion at 12 weeks and post-program employment at 24 months. Cluster randomization of each training cohort will be performed with a 1:1:1:1 allocation ratio using a site stratified, permuted-block group schema. Final sample size is expected to be 400 participants (100 per group). Students enrolled in Community Builder’s Trades & Diversity Training Program in either the city of Barrie or Sudbury (in…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth Policy Implementation Science · Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare · Primary Care and Health Outcomes
