Impact of stroke imaging selection modality on endovascular thrombectomy outcomes in the early and extended time windows: A meta‐analysis

TL;DR

This study compares how different imaging methods affect outcomes for stroke patients undergoing a specific treatment called endovascular thrombectomy.

Contribution

The study provides new evidence on the benefits of advanced imaging over basic imaging in stroke treatment outcomes.

Findings

Advanced imaging was linked to better functional recovery in early stroke treatment.

Advanced imaging reduced mortality in both early and extended treatment time windows.

No significant differences were found in bleeding risks or reperfusion success between imaging types.

Abstract

The effect of imaging selection modality on endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS‐LVO) remains unclear. This study aims to compare post‐EVT outcomes in patients with AIS‐LVO who underwent basic imaging (computed tomography with or without computed tomography angiography) and advanced imaging (computed tomography perfusion or magnetic resonance imaging) in early and late time windows.

A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception until June 10, 2023. Studies investigating the relationship between the imaging selection modality and post‐EVT outcomes in patients with AIS‐LVO were retrieved. A random‐effects model was used to pool the effect estimates of successful reperfusion, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), functional independence, and mortality. The meta‐analysis was performed using Review Manager software v.4.3, and the outcomes were assessed using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

A total of 13 non‐randomized observational studies, comprising 19,694 patients, were included in this meta‐analysis. In the early time windows, AIS‐LVO patients receiving advanced imaging demonstrated a higher likelihood of functional independence (OR, 1.25, 95% CI, 1.08–1.46) and a lower risk of mortality (OR,.73 95% CI,.61–.86) compared to those receiving basic imaging. In the extended time windows, AIS‐LVO patients undergoing advanced imaging had a lower mortality rate (OR,.79, 95% CI,.68–.92). Regardless of the time of onset, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sICH or successful reperfusion.

Advanced imaging combined with EVT may achieve better clinical outcomes in patients with AIS‐LVO. Further high‐quality studies are needed to validate these findings.

Impact of stroke imaging selection modality on endovascular thrombectomy outcomes

Figures