Corrigendum: Genetically predicted lipids mediate the association between intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and cardiovascular disease
Ji Cui, Qilong Zhai, Mengjie Chen, Zhu Yang
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment · Birth, Development, and Health · Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
In the published article, there was an error in Figure 1 as published. The SNP screening threshold was incorrectly written as P < 1 × 10^−8^. The correct threshold is P < 5 × 10^−8^. The corrected Figure 1 and it's caption appears below.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
In the published article, there was an error. A prerequisite for the exclusion of outlier SNPs is missing before the description of the results of the sensitivity analyses.
A correction has been made to Results, 3.1 Causal effect between ICP and CVD (CAD, HTN) via TSMR. This sentence previously stated:
“The robustness of the results was assessed through Cochran's Q test, the MR-Egger intercept test and MR-PRESSO, as detailed in Supplementary Material Table S3.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“After removing outlier SNP, the causal relationship between ICP and CVD still remained. The robustness of the results after removing outlier SNP was assessed through Cochran's Q test, the MR-Egger intercept test and MR-PRESSO, as detailed in Supplementary Material Table S3.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
In the published article, there was an error in Supplementary Table 3. The results of the sensitivity analyses in the original Supplementary Table 3 were incorrectly calculated due to incomplete data extraction and exclusion of outlier SNP values; the revised results are shown in the corrected Supplementary Table 3. The correct material statement appears below.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.