Corrigendum: Liu W-B, Wang C-Y, Tang Y-N, Wang Y, Pei W-X, Yan C-C (2024) Six new species of Cryptochironomus Kieffer (Diptera, Chironomidae) from the Nearctic region. ZooKeys 1200: 275–302. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1200.119225
Wen-Bin Liu, Cheng-Yan Wang, Ya-Ning Tang, Ying Wang, Wen-Xuan Pei, Chun-Cai Yan

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| 1 | Anal point broad and flat |
|
| – | Anal point narrow |
|
| 2 | Mesal apical margin of gonostylus emarginate |
|
| – | Mesal apical margin of gonostylus straight or nearly straight |
|
| 3 | Mesal apical margin of gonostylus emarginate |
|
| – | Mesal apical margin of gonostylus not emarginate |
|
| 4 | Gonostylus ~ 4× as long as wide, AR about 3.7, Wing length 3.1–3.4 mm |
|
| – | Gonostylus ~ 1.6–3.7× as long as wide; when AR higher than 3.6, Wing length higher than 3.4 mm or lower than 3.1 mm |
|
| 5 | Gonostylus widened towards apex; frontal tubercles present; AR 1.99–5.1; LR1 1.12–1.73, 9–24 sensilla chaetica on P2 |
|
| – | Gonostylus not distinctly widened towards apex; frontal tubercles mostly absent, when present AR 2.5–3.8, LR11.45–2.02 and mostly 1–6 sensilla chaetica on P2; when AR higher than 3.5, LR1 higher than 1.59 |
|
| 6 | AR 1.99–2.76; LR1 1.60–1.7 |
|
| – | AR 3.54–5.12; LR1 1.12–1.39 |
|
| 7 | Wing length 2.43–2.65; anal point widest at the base and slightly constricted at 1/3 distance from the base |
|
| – | Wing length 2.05–2.37; anal point is parallel-sided with a rounded apex |
|
| 8 | AR 1.99–2.37; thorax brown with dark brown spots |
|
| – | AR 2.48–2.76; thorax yellowish brown without spots |
|
| 9 | AR 4.35–5.12, LR1 1.12–1.21; gonostylus strongly widened towards apex |
|
| – | AR 3.54–4.03, LR1 1.23–1.39; gonostylus slightly widened towards apex |
|
| 10 | LR1 1.31–1.67, frontal tubercles absent |
|
| – | LR1 1.45–2.02, when lower than 1.7 frontal tubercles present |
|
| 11 | Wing length 4.99–5.78 mm; LR1 1.48–1.67 |
|
| – | Wing length 1.47–4.75 mm; LR1 1.31–1.55 |
|
| 12 | Wing length 4.05 mm; gonostylus widest width near apex |
|
| – | Wing length 2.31–2.59 mm; gonostylus gradually tapered and pointed apically |
|
| 13 | Wing length 1.47–1.8 mm, gonostylus only ~ 2× as long as wide |
|
| – | Wing length 1.9–5.6 mm, gonostylus at least 2.5× as long as wide |
|
| 14 | Wing length 1.8 mm, AR 2.75, frontal tubercles present |
|
| – | Wing length 1.47–1.69 mm, AR 2.29–2.49, frontal tubercles absent |
|
| 15 | Gonostylus ~ 2.8–3.2× as long as wide, anal point slightly spatulate apically, frontal tubercles absent |
|
| – | Gonostylus ~ 2.7× as long as wide, anal point tapering parallel-sided or slightly spatulate, frontal tubercles present or absent |
|
| 16 | Frontal tubercles absent, wing length 2.0–5.6 mm |
|
| – | Frontal tubercles present, wing length 1.8–3.2 mm or 5.1–5.3 mm |
|
| 17 | Gonostylus rounded apically, wing length 2.5–5.6 mm |
|
| – | Gonostylus tapering to the apex, wing length 2.02 mm |
|
| 18 | Wing length 5.1–5.3 mm; AR 2.5–2.6 |
|
| – | Wing length 1.8–3.2 mm; AR 2.5–3.4 |
|
| 19 | LR1 1.56–1.73, mean 1.64; anal point slightly spatulate apically |
|
| – | LR1 1.60–2.02, mean 1.78, anal point parallel-sided |
|
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMetallurgy and Material Forming · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
We recently published six new species of Cryptochironomus Kieffer (Diptera, Chironomidae) from the Nearctic region. However, the authors made some errors in couplet 4, in that the values given in the second alternative of the couplet do not agree with in the least the values that appear further down the key (couplet 7, etc.), and parentheses were missing in authorities of three species. In this corrigendum, we revise the key to Nearctic males of Cryptochironomus. We thank Dr. Martin Spies (Zoologische Staatssammlung München, München) for kindly pointing out the error in contradictions between couplets.
Key to Nearctic males of Cryptochironomus Kieffer
The key adapted from Sæther 2009.
**: **
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
