Correction: Untangling the Evolution of the Receptor-Binding Motif of SARS-CoV-2
Luis Delaye, Lizbeth Román-Padilla

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Correction to: Journal of Molecular Evolution (2024) 92:329–337 10.1007/s00239-024-10175-y
In this article the phylogenies was missing in Fig. 4; the corrected Fig. 4 should have appeared as shown below.Fig. 4. The RBM from RaTG13 has a distinct phylogenetic history than its RBD. Tree on the left is from the concatenation of segments 2 and 4 (containing the RBD); and the tree on the right is from segment 3 (containing the RBM). At the bottom we show segments 2 and 4 (left) and 3 (right) colored by subdomains and motifs. The vertical red lines indicate the recombination breakpoints identified by GARD. At the top of the Figure we show the cumulative dissonance by clades. The hosts are shown for clarity. Note that RaTG13 branches in different clades between the two trees
