# Health economic evaluation of an electronic mindfulness-based intervention (eMBI) to improve maternal mental health during pregnancy – a randomized controlled trial (RCT)

**Authors:** Lena Hasemann, Svenja Elkenkamp, Mitho Müller, Armin Bauer, Stephanie Wallwiener, Wolfgang Greiner

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00537-z · Health Economics Review · 2024-07-30

## TL;DR

A study evaluated an electronic mindfulness program for pregnant women's mental health but found no significant cost savings in healthcare.

## Contribution

The study provides health economic insights into an electronic mindfulness-based intervention for maternal mental health in Germany.

## Key findings

- The intervention group had higher healthcare costs compared to the control group.
- Results were not significant after Bonferroni correction.
- No significant impact on healthcare costs was observed from a societal perspective.

## Abstract

Anxiety and depression are the most prevalent psychiatric diseases in the peripartum period. They can lead to relevant health consequences for mother and child as well as increased health care resource utilization (HCRU) and related costs. Due to the promising results of mindfulness-based interventions (MBI) and digital health applications in mental health, an electronic MBI on maternal mental health during pregnancy was implemented and assessed in terms of transferability to standard care in Germany. The present study focused the health economic outcomes of the randomized controlled trial (RCT).

The analysis, adopting a payer’s and a societal perspective, included women of increased emotional distress at < 29 weeks of gestation. We applied inferential statistics (α = 0.05 significance level) to compare the intervention group (IG) and control group (CG) in terms of HCRU and costs. The analysis was primarily based on statutory health insurance claims data which covered the individual observational period of 40 weeks.

Overall, 258 women (IG: 117, CG: 141) were included in the health economic analysis. The results on total health care costs from a payer’s perspective indicated higher costs for the IGi compared to the CG (Exp(ß) = 1.096, 95% CI: 1.006–1.194, p = 0.037). However, the estimation was not significant after Bonferroni correction (p < 0.006). Even the analysis from a societal perspective as well as sensitivity analyses did not show significant results.

In the present study, the eMBI did neither reduced nor significantly increased health care costs. Further research is needed to generate robust evidence on eMBIs for women suffering from peripartum depression and anxiety.

German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00017210. Registered on 13 January 2020. Retrospectively registered.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13561-024-00537-z.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** anxiety (MONDO:0005618), depression (MONDO:0002050)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** depression (MESH:D003866), Anxiety (MESH:D001007), psychiatric diseases (MESH:D001523), emotional distress (MESH:D012128)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11290259/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11290259/full.md

## References

6 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11290259/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11290259