Safety evaluation of a second extension of use of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐AMT
Holger Zorn, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Francesco Catania, Gabriele Gadermaier, Ralf Greiner, Baltasar Mayo, Alicja Mortensen, Yrjö Henrik Roos, Marize L. M. Solano, Monika Sramkova, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Daniele Cavanna, Yi Liu, Roos Anna de Nijs

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the safety of extending the use of a food enzyme produced by a non-genetically modified bacteria in additional food processes.
Contribution
The study provides a safety evaluation for extending the use of α-amylase in three new food manufacturing processes.
Findings
Dietary exposure to the food enzyme was estimated at up to 0.049 mg TOS/kg body weight per day.
A margin of exposure of at least 4694 was calculated, indicating no safety concerns.
The enzyme is considered safe for the extended use in ten food manufacturing processes.
Abstract
The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase i.e. EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐AMT by Amano Enzyme Inc. A safety evaluation of this food enzyme was made previously, in which EFSA concluded that the food enzyme did not give rise to safety concerns when used in seven food manufacturing processes. Subsequently, the applicant has requested to extend its use to include three additional processes. In this assessment, EFSA updated the safety evaluation of this food enzyme when used in a total of ten food manufacturing processes. As the food enzyme‐total organic solids (TOS) are removed from the final foods in one food manufacturing process, the dietary exposure to the food enzyme‐TOS was estimated only for the remaining nine processes. The dietary exposure was calculated to be up to 0.049 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw)…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOccupational exposure and asthma · Agricultural safety and regulations · Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
