Post-traumatic Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Fractures: Benefits of the Hardinge Approach

TL;DR

This study shows that using the Hardinge approach for hip replacement after traumatic arthritis reduces dislocation risks in patients with prior hip fractures.

Contribution

The study demonstrates the Hardinge approach's effectiveness in reducing dislocation rates for post-traumatic hip arthroplasty.

Findings

No patient in the study experienced dislocation after THA using the Hardinge approach.

The all-cause revision rate was 9.7%, with no revisions due to implant loosening.

Implants remained stable with no radiographic loosening at final follow-up.

Abstract

Post-traumatic arthritis is a common sequelae after undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of acetabular fractures. This often necessitates conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) to help alleviate pain and improve function for these patients. Unfortunately, dislocation rates for post-traumatic THA have been alarmingly high especially when the posterior approach has been used. In the setting of prior soft tissue disruption, the theoretical risk of dislocation is even greater. Conversely, the lateral or the abductor-split approach (Hardinge) is associated with decreased dislocation rates. In this retrospective case series, we evaluated the dislocation rate of the Hardinge approach on patients who underwent THA after developing post-traumatic arthritis after acetabulum ORIF. All patients who matched CPT code 27132 (Repair, Revision, and/or Reconstruction Procedures on the Pelvis and Hip Joint), from January 2009 to December 2019, and treated by the senior author, were pulled from the electronic medical record at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Thirty-one of the resultant 110 were treated with THA for post-traumatic arthrosis through a lateral, abductor-splitting Hardinge approach and met the inclusion criteria for further study. Our case series involves 31 patients who underwent post-traumatic THA through a Hardinge approach: the mean age at the time of index acetabular ORIF is 48.5 years, the mean age at the time of THA is 53.5 years, and the mean interval between ORIF and ultimate THA was five years. The mean length of follow-up after THA was 22.4 months. Overall, patients did well with an all-cause revision rate of 9.7%, with no revision performed for loosening of either the acetabular or femoral component. One patient developed an infection. No patient in our group sustained a dislocation, and all implants were stable without evidence of radiographic loosening at the final follow-up. This study found satisfactory results with patients undergoing THA via lateral or abductor split approach (Hardinge) for post-traumatic arthritis after acetabular ORIF. The use of a Hardinge approach for post-traumatic reconstruction of the hip may be protective against dislocation without increasing baseline risks in this difficult patient population.

Figures