Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptoms in Patients Undergoing Flexible Cystoscopy
Rafiullah Khan, Syed M Nazim, Shahid Iqbal

TL;DR
Flexible cystoscopy can temporarily increase overactive bladder symptoms in patients, with some developing new symptoms that usually resolve over time.
Contribution
This study is the first to use the OAB-V8 tool to track changes in overactive bladder symptoms immediately after flexible cystoscopy.
Findings
OAB symptoms increased significantly on day 1 after cystoscopy but returned to baseline by day 4.
26.2% of patients developed new OAB symptoms after the procedure.
Age, gender, and medication use did not significantly affect OAB score changes.
Abstract
Objective: The objective is to measure the change in overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms in patients undergoing flexible cystoscopy in the early postoperative period using a validated OAB-V8 tool. Patients and methods: It was a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study conducted by a section of Urology at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi. The total duration of the study was 12 months (July 2022 to June 2023). All adult patients who underwent flexible cystoscopy under local anesthesia for diagnostic and surveillance purposes were included in the study. OAB symptoms were evaluated using the validated eight-item OAB-V8 tool just before the cystoscopy and on postoperative days 1 and 4. Patients were categorized as either OAB-negative (<8) or OAB-positive (≥8) based on their sum scores. Mean sum scores of different variables and OAB subdomains were assessed. Results:…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| n | Percentage | |
| Number of patients | 63 | 100 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 47 | 74.6 |
| Female | 16 | 23.4 |
| Avg. Age | 62.7 (SD: 13.6) | |
| Age>50 | 53 | 84.1 |
| Age<50 | 10 | 15.9 |
| Indication | ||
| LUTS | 01 | 1.58 |
| Hematuria | 07 | 11.11 |
| Surveillance | 53 | 84.1 |
| Others | 02 | 3.17 |
| Medications (Alpha Blockers) | ||
| Yes | 20 | 31.7 |
| No | 43 | 68.3 |
| Pre-cystoscopy Score | ||
| OAB-Positive | 21 | 33.3 |
| OAB-Negative | 43 | 67.7 |
| Patients with de-novo OAB symptoms | n=11 |
| Age, mean (years) | 59.9(SD:16.5) |
| Age > 50 | 08 |
| Age < 50 | 03 |
| Gender | -- |
| Male | 09 |
| Female | 02 |
| Indication | -- |
| LUTS | 01 |
| Surveillance | 10 |
| Mean OAB | -- |
| Day-0 | 4.72 (+/-1.73) |
| Day-1 | 11.90 (+/-2.38) |
| Day-4 | 5.54 (+/-2.38) |
| Time | OAB-negative, n (%) | OAB-positive, n (%) | Total | De-novo OAB +ve, n (%) |
| Pre-cystoscopy | 42 (67.7) | 21 (33.3) | 63 | -- |
| Day-1 | 31 (49.2) | 32 (50.8) | 63 | 11 (26.2) |
| Day-4 | 40 (63.5) | 23(36.5) | 63 | 02 (3.2) |
| Population | Frequency during day | Uncomfortable urge during day | Sudden urge to urinate | Accidental loss of urine | Nighttime urination | Waking up at night to urinate | Uncontrollable urge | Urine loss associated with strong desire | Sum score |
| Total Sample (n=63) | |||||||||
| Day-0 | 1.17 (+/- 1.10) | 0.87 (+/-0.94) | 0.5873 (+/-0.83) | 0.1111 (+/-0.36) | 1.47 (+/-1.29) | 1.09 (+/-1.32) | 0.50 (+/-0.89) | 0.09 (+/-0.34) | 7.46 (+/-5.58) |
| Day-1 | 1.68 (+/-1.30) | 1.36 (+/-1.18) | 1.15 (+/-1.64) | 0.23 (+/-0.49) | 1.76 (+/-1.38) | 1.38 (+/-1.36) | 0.71 (+/-0.95) | 0.11 (+/-0.36) | 9.89 (+/-6.82) |
| Day-4 | 1.41 (+/-1.18) (p=0.001) | 0.92 (+/-0.97) (p=0.001) | 0.60 (+/-0.83) (p=0.007) | 0.11 (+/-0.36) (p=0.004) | 1.46 (+/-1.29) (p=0.001) | 1.09 (+/-1.24) (p=0.001) | 0.42 (+/-0.73) (p=0.002) | 0.07 (+/-0.32) (p=0.226) | 7.68 (+/-5.68) (p=0.001) |
| Men (n=47) | |||||||||
| Day-0 | 1.08 (+/-1.08) | 0.76 (+/-0.86) | 0.48 (+/-0.71) | 0.04 (+/-0.20) | 1.38 (+/-1.26) | 1.00 (+/-1.28) | 0.44 (+/-0.87) | 0.06 (+/-0.24) | 7.25 (+/-5.01) |
| Day-1 | 1.55 (+/-1.28) | 1.23 (+/-1.14) | 0.87 (+/-1.01) | 0.12 (+/-0.33) | 1.63 (+/-1.30) | 1.29 (+/-1.28) | 0.61 (+/-0.82) | 0.04 (+/-0.20) | 9.38 (+/-6.23) |
| Day-4 | 1.31 (+/-1.19) | 0.76 (+/-0.86) | 0.48 (+/-0.71) | 0.04 (+/-0.20) | 1.40 (+/-1.27) | 1.00 (+/-1.17) | 0.36 (+/-0.67) | 0.04 (+/-0.20) | 7.44 (+/-5.08) |
| Women (n=16) | |||||||||
| Day-0 | 1.43 (+/-1.15) | 1.18 (+/-1.10) | 0.87 (+/-1.08) | 0.31 (+/-0.60) | 1.75 (+/-1.39) | 1.37 (+/-1.45) | 0.68 (+/-0.94) | 0.18 (+/-0.54) | 8.06 (+/-7.16) |
| Day-1 | 2.06 (+/-1.34) | 1.75 (+/-1.23) | 2.00 (+/-2.65) | 0.56 (+/-0.72) | 2.12 (+/-1.58) | 1.62 (+/-1.58) | 1.00 (+/-1.26) | 0.31 (+/-0.60) | 11.00 (+/-8.45) |
| Day-4 | 1.68 (+/-1.13) | 1.37 (+/-1.14) | 0.93 (+/-1.06) | 0.31 (+/-0.60) | 1.62 (+/-1.36) | 1.37 (+/-1.40) | 0.62 (+/-0.88) | 0.18 (+/-0.54) | 8.37 (+/-7.31) |
| OAB-Negative (n =42) | |||||||||
| Day-0 | 0.64 (+/-0.53) | 0.47 (+/-0.50) | 0.26 (+/-0.44) | 0.02 (+/-0.15) | 0.76 (+/-0.69) | 0.38 (+/-0.66) | 0.04 (+/-0.21) | 0.01 (+/-0.01) | 4.21 (+/-1.86) |
| Day-1 | 1.11 (+/-0.94) | 0.90 (+/-0.79) | 0.83 (+/-1.76) | 0.04 (+/-0.30) | 1.07 (+/-0.89) | 0.71 (+/-0.83) | 0.26 (+/-0.49) | 0.23 (+/-0.15) | 6.33 (+/-3.96) |
| Day-4 | 0.83 (+/-0.65) | 0.50 (+/-0.50) | 0.23 (+/-0.43) | 0.02 (+/-0.15) | 0.76 (+/-0.72) | 0.42 (+/-0.63) | 0.04 (+/-0.21) | 0.01 (+/-0.01) | 4.45 (+/-2.10) |
| OAB-Positive (n=21) | |||||||||
| Day-0 | 2.23 (+/-1.17) | 1.66 (+/-1.11) | 1.23 (+/-1.04) | 0.28 (+/-0.56) | 2.90 (+/-0.99) | 2.52 (+/-1.16) | 1.42 (+/-1.02) | 0.28 (+/-0.56) | 13.95 (+/-4.82) |
| Day-1 | 2.80 (+/-1.20) | 2.28 (+/-1.30) | 1.80 (+/-1.16) | 0.61 (+/-0.58) | 3.14 (+/-1.15) | 2.71 (+/-1.23) | 1.61 (+/-1.02) | 0.28 (+/-0.56) | 16.71 (+/-6.07) |
| Day-4 | 2.57 (+/-1.16) | 1.76 (+/-1.13) | 1.33 (+/-0.96) | 0.28 (+/-0.56) | 2.85 (+/-1.01) | 2.42 (+/-1.07) | 1.19 (+/-0.81) | 0.23 (+/-0.53) | 14.14 (+/-5.03) |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPelvic floor disorders treatments · Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research · Urinary Tract Infections Management
Introduction
Cystoscopy stands as a pivotal endo-urological procedure and diagnostic tool for examining the urinary bladder via the urethra [1]. Studies indicate that both rigid and flexible cystoscopies are well-tolerated and safe for patients. However, flexible cystoscopy tends to induce less discomfort in comparison, regardless of gender [2,3]. Patients may experience symptoms such as urgency, frequency, dysuria, hematuria, and occasional urinary incontinence post-cystoscopy [4].
Defined by the International Continence Society (ICS), overactive bladder (OAB) encompasses symptoms like urinary urgency, with or without urgency incontinence, often coupled with frequency and nocturia [5]. Various patient-reported outcome questionnaires have been introduced to screen for OAB and assess symptom severity, including the Bladder Assessment Tool (BAT), Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-V8) [6]. The OAB-V8 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that measures the degree of bother from four symptoms related to OAB, i.e., urinary frequency, urgency, nocturia, and urge incontinence on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 5 (a very great deal) with a maximum possible score of 40 [7]. Malde et al. tested different validated tools for assessing the OAB and found OAB-V8 to demonstrate the highest sensitivity (98%) [6].
Recently, Saratlija et al. observed the impact of both rigid and flexible cystoscopies on OAB symptoms. They found that cystoscopy can induce OAB symptoms in patients without a prior OAB history (de novo OAB), while patients with pre-existing OAB symptoms (OAB-positive) often experience a reduction in symptoms post-cystoscopy [8].
There is a lack of data regarding the prevalence of OAB in the urological population particularly regarding the relationship between OAB symptoms and patients undergoing flexible (awake) cystoscopy. Understanding this relationship could aid in identifying patients at risk, managing new symptoms, and providing counseling. Hence, we conducted this study aiming to measure changes in OAB symptoms post-flexible cystoscopy, utilizing the validated OAB-V8 tool at early post-operative stages (day 1 and day 4). In addition, we sought to explore potential factors such as gender, age, and suspected pathology/prior diseases that may influence changes in OAB symptoms following flexible cystoscopy as our secondary objective.
Materials and methods
It was a single-center, prospective observational study carried out by the section of urology at the Aga Khan University Hospital. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethical Review Committee (ERC ref: 2022-7365-21844). All patients undergoing flexible cystoscopy, meeting the inclusion criteria, during the one-year study period (July 2022 to June 2023) at our center were included in the study.
We employed a non-probability consecutive sampling method to prospectively enroll adult patients (> 18 years) presenting at the urology clinic, scheduled for flexible cystoscopy under local anesthesia for diagnostic or surveillance purposes between July 2022 and June 2023, who could comprehend simple English language. We excluded patients with active urinary tract infections, pregnant individuals, those with indwelling catheters, genitourinary (GU) tuberculosis, interstitial cystitis, or those planned for interventions such as cold cup biopsy/fulguration or stent removal. Patients already taking anticholinergic and/or B3-agonist medications or experiencing cognitive impairment and inability to communicate with staff were also excluded.
A comprehensive assessment including history, physical examination, urinalysis, culture/sensitivity, diagnostic ultrasonography of the bladder, and frequency volume charting was conducted initially. Written informed consent was obtained after explaining the procedure, study protocol, potential benefits, and risks, and the OAB-V8 screening tool to the patient.
Flexible cystoscopy was performed using an OlympusTM (Aizu Olympus Co., Ltd, Fukushima, Japan) size 15.3 Fr flexible cystoscope under local anesthesia. Standard antibiotic prophylaxis with Inj. Gentamycin 80 mg I/V or an alternative antibiotic (in case of allergy/contraindication) was administered. Local anesthetic gel Xylocaine 2% was instilled in the urethra, and male patients were positioned supine while female patients were positioned in the frog-leg supine position. Postoperative analgesia comprised Tab. Paracetamol two tablets up to three times per day for three to five days and a urinary tract alkalizer.
OAB symptoms were assessed using the validated eight-item OAB Screening Awareness Tool (OAB-V8) just before flexible cystoscopy, and two forms were provided to each patient in an envelope for completion on postoperative days 1 and 4. Questionnaires were collected during the follow-up visit after one week, and data were entered using a pre-designed Performa. Patients with significant symptoms were counseled on treatment strategies such as lifestyle modifications, bladder training, and appropriate medication(s).
Data were analyzed using SPSS v. 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Patients were categorized into baseline positive, or negative OAB symptoms groups based on pre-cystoscopy screening (<8 and ≥8 sum-score on OAB-V8 tool, respectively). Mean ± SD/median (IQR) was used for descriptive statistics for quantitative variables, while frequency and percentages were used for qualitative variables. Differences between pre-cystoscopy and post-cystoscopy day 1 and day 4 scores were assessed using repeated measure ANOVA/Friedman test. Mann-Whitney U test/independent T-test determined differences in quantitative variables between OAB positive and negative groups. The chi-square test/Fisher exact test determined the relationship of qualitative variables with OAB status (positive or negative). The statistical significance level was kept at p<0.05.
Results
During the study period, a total of 95 flexible cystoscopies were conducted, with 75 patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria and being enrolled in the study. The remaining 20 patients were excluded due to tumor recurrence (five), bladder biopsies (eight), DJ stent removal (three), and unable to comprehend simple English language (four). Of these 75 patients, 63 (84%) diligently completed all three OAB questionnaires (pre-procedure, day 1, and day 4), thus being included in the final analysis. Among them, there were 47 (74.6%) male and 16 (23.4%) female patients (Table 1).
In the sample population, the average pre-cystoscopy OAB score was 7.46 + 5.58, which increased to 9.89 + 6.82 on day 1 (p<0.01) before decreasing back to 7.68 + 5.7 on day 4. Significant differences were observed between the average scores pre-cystoscopy and on day 1 (p<0.01), as well as between day 1 and day 4 OAB scores (p<0.01). However, the difference between pre-cystoscopy and day 4 scores was not significant (p=0.08). ANOVA results indicated a notable change in OAB symptoms following flexible cystoscopy (p<0.01). Furthermore, women exhibited a higher mean baseline OAB score of 8.06 + 7.16 compared to men's 7.25 + 5.01, a pattern consistent across individual questions as well.
Using the OAB-V8 questionnaire cut-off values (0-7: OAB-Negative, 8-40: OAB-Positive), 42 patients (66.7%) were categorized as OAB-negative based on their pre-cystoscopy scores, while 21 patients (33.3%) were OAB-positive. Following the procedure, the number of patients with a positive OAB score increased to 32 patients (50.8%) on the first post-procedure day, with OAB-negative patients accounting for 49.8% (31 patients) of the study population. Among the initially OAB-negative patients (n=42), 11 patients (26.2% of the OAB-negative group) developed de novo OAB-positive symptoms, significantly decreasing to 4.7% on post-procedure day 4 (p<0.01). Demographic data for this patient subgroup are presented in Table 2.
Male and elderly patients appeared to be more prone to developing de novo OAB symptoms, although these tendencies did not reach statistical significance. The indication for cystoscopy, pre-cystoscopy OAB score, and the use of alpha-blockers showed no significant impact on the development of de novo OAB symptoms.
Among patients initially identified as OAB-positive during the pre-cystoscopy assessment, there was an observed increase in mean OAB score from 13.9 + 4.82 to 16.7 + 6.07 (p=0.01) on the first post-cystoscopy day, which then decreased to a mean of 14.1 + 5.03 on post-cystoscopy day 4 (p<0.01). However, comparing pre-cystoscopy and day 4 scores, the overall net change on day 4 was found to be insignificant (p=1.0). Subgroup analysis also revealed no significant impact of age (p=0.5), gender (p=0.51), indication (p=0.22), or use of alpha-blockers (p=0.30) on the change in OAB score. Table 3 displays the OAB-positive and negative groups, while the mean scores for the total population and evaluated subgroups are presented in Table 4.
Discussion
OAB symptoms (defined as the presence of urgency with or without urge incontinence, frequency, and nocturia in the absence of any pathology), are estimated to have an overall prevalence of 10%-17% in the adult population [9,10].
There is limited data on the prevalence of OAB in people with urological problems, which is anticipated to be higher but often goes undiagnosed [11]. This study aimed to examine the impact of flexible cystoscopy, age, gender, comorbidities, and indication for flexible cystoscopy on changes in OAB symptoms using a validated questionnaire (OAB-V8) in a sample population of 63 patients, yielding some noteworthy findings.
The OAB-V8, an eight-item score derived from a 33-item OAB questionnaire (OAB-q), is easy to fill with a low rate of unanswered questions and high internal consistency [6]. It has been validated in multiple languages including English, French, Arabic, Danish, German, Italian, Korean, Polish, Spanish, and Turkish.
In our study, the rate of OAB-positive patients was 33.3% of the study sample, with male and female prevalence of 29.7% and 43.7%, respectively, which is lower than that reported by Saratlija et al. (44%) [8]. Using the same threshold and questionnaire, this was much lower than the 75% prevalence rate reported by Cheung et al. in male urologic veterans [12].
Flexible cystoscopy led to an increase in the mean sum score of OAB symptoms in the study population, but there was no statistically significant difference in mean scores between day 0 and day 4, suggesting that flexible cystoscopy can exacerbate OAB symptoms temporarily, with patients returning to baseline scores over time. The occurrence of new-onset (de novo) OAB symptoms in 26.2% of the study population on day 1 after flexible cystoscopy indicates that the passage of the cystoscope may exacerbate symptoms, although this effect is short-lived.
Saratlija et al. also made an intriguing observation that patients positive for OAB symptoms experienced a short-term decrease in their symptom scores, which they attributed to the dilatation of the lower urinary tract [8]. Unlike Saratlija et al., we did not observe a mean decrease in OAB score post-cystoscopy; instead, there was an average rise in the mean score, almost returning to baseline by day 4, which is more understandable. We excluded patients taking anticholinergics or B-3 agonist medications, whereas Saratlija et al. [8] did not capture medication intake, which could potentially affect OAB symptoms following cystoscopy and influence their results. We did not find any impact of age, gender, comorbidities, or indication for cystoscopy on OAB symptoms post-flexible cystoscopy.
Strengths of our study include its prospective design, use of a validated OAB-screening tool, and assessment of a non-selected population, reflecting patients in daily practice. Limitations include a small sample size and single-center design. The results of this study will inform patient counseling, management, and the need for intervention in the future.
Conclusions
OAB symptoms are common in patients undergoing flexible cystoscopy. Flexible cystoscopy can transiently trigger de novo OAB symptoms in some patients which typically resolve over time, however, uninfluenced by gender, age, and indication for flexible cystoscopy. Proper patient counseling, accordingly, can prevent unnecessary hospital visits.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Cystoscopy Cystoscopy Engelsgjerd JS Deibert CM Treasure Island, FL Stat Pearls Publishing 2024 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29630232/29630232 · pubmed ↗
- 2Does office-based flexible cystoscopy provide better pain perception than rigid cystoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ann Palliat Med Feng D Chen G Yang Y Wei W Wei X 622862351020213411884710.21037/apm-21-316 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Procedural module: flexible cystoscopy J Endourol Safiullah S Lama DJ Patel R Clayman RV 0632201810.1089/end.2017.070629774810 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Patients' experiences at home after day case cystoscopy J Clin Nurs Erkal S 111811241620071751888610.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01500.x · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society Neurourol Urodyn Abrams P Cardozo L Fall M 1671782120021185767110.1002/nau.10052 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Case-finding tools for the diagnosis of OAB in women: a narrative review Neurourol Urodyn Malde S Kelly S Saad S Sahai A 13243920203157876410.1002/nau.24171 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Evaluating the 8-item overactive bladder questionnaire (OAB-v 8) using item response theory Neurourol Urodyn Peterson AC Sehgal A Crump RT Baverstock R Sutherland JM Carlson K 109511003720182897659610.1002/nau.23420 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Overactive bladder symptoms in patients undergoing rigid and flexible cystoscopy World J Urol Saratlija Novakovic Z Puljak L Sapunar D 198919963820203169108510.1007/s 00345-019-02993-3 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
