# Implementation and adoption of SOAP-M and SBAR at a German anesthesiology department – a single-center survey study

**Authors:** Oliver Keil, Justus Bernd Wegener, Benjamin Schiller, Mathäus Vetter, Markus Flentje, Hendrik Eismann

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02650-2 · BMC Anesthesiology · 2024-07-26

## TL;DR

This study examines how well two checklists, SOAP-M and SBAR, were adopted in a German anesthesiology department one year after implementation.

## Contribution

The study provides insights into the adoption and perceived usefulness of SOAP-M and SBAR in a real-world clinical setting.

## Key findings

- Staff with high safety attitudes found both checklists useful and used them commonly.
- No significant differences in checklist adoption were found between nurses and physicians or among different experience levels.
- Users of the checklists reported higher perceived usefulness and felt more supported by their use.

## Abstract

Checklists are a common tool used in order to mitigate risks caused by human factors and can facilitate the safe induction of anesthesia as well as handovers. SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) is a checklist recommended by the WHO and DGAI for handovers, while SOAP-M (Suction, Oxygen, Airway, Pharmaceuticals, Monitoring) is a checklist for the induction of anesthesia. This study investigates the implementation and adoption of these two checklists.

We conducted a single-center online survey one year after the implementation of SOAP-M and SBAR at a university hospital’s anesthesiology department, using scales from three validated questionnaires to assess safety attitudes as well as the behavior of staff and the perceived usefulness of the checklists.

Staff with a high score in general attitude towards patient safety, as determined by the safety attitudes questionnaire, considered both checklists useful additions to their work environment. Nurses and physicians (p = 0.102) as well as groups divided according to work experience (p = 0.077) showed no significant differences in using SOAP-M and SBAR. Perceived usefulness was significantly higher (p < 0.001) among users of the checklists, and the same goes for positive reinforcement (p < 0.001), social cues (p = 0.0215) and goal cues (p = 0.0252).

SOAP-M and SBAR are perceived as useful checklists for patient handovers and anesthesia induction by tertiary referral hospital’s employees with high score in general safety attitude and were therefore commonly used one year after their introduction. No significant difference in checklist adoption between occupations as well as groups divided according to work experience could be found. Perceived usefulness is significantly higher among users of the checklist, who feel using the checklists provides more support.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11282676/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11282676/full.md

## References

4 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11282676/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11282676