# Molecular Survey on the Occurrence of Tick-Borne Bacteria in Wild Birds from Central Italy

## TL;DR

This study found that wild birds in Central Italy can carry several zoonotic tick-borne bacteria, suggesting they may help spread these pathogens.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into the role of wild birds as carriers of tick-borne bacteria in avian spleen tissues.

## Key findings

- 17.67% of bird spleen samples tested positive for at least one tick-borne pathogen.
- C. psittaci was the most commonly detected pathogen, found in 12% of samples.
- No coinfections were observed among the tested pathogens.

## Abstract

Birds are known to be carriers of ticks, both Argasidae and Ixodidae, which often harbor bacterial pathogens. Climatic changes observed in the last years have influenced tick distributions in several geographic areas and the migratory behaviors of many avian species; consequently, wild birds can be responsible for the introduction of ticks and relative pathogens, most of which are zoonotic, in new environments. Some studies have been carried out to detect tick-borne bacteria in ticks removed from birds worldwide, but surveys on the presence of these pathogens directly in avifauna are very scanty. This study evaluated the occurrence of tick-borne bacteria, such as Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Bartonella spp., Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Chlamydia psittaci, Coxiella burnetii, Ehrlichia canis, Francisella tularensis, and Rickettsia spp., in avian spleen samples, and the obtained results suggested that wild avifauna may be involved in the epidemiology of some of the investigated pathogens.

Birds are known to be carriers of ticks infected by tick-borne pathogens, including bacteria. However, not many studies have been carried out on avian tissues to detect these agents. The aim of the present survey was to investigate, using PCR, the presence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Bartonella spp., Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Chlamydia psittaci, Coxiella burnetii, Ehrlichia canis, Francisella tularensis, and Rickettsia spp. in the spleens collected from 300 wild birds of different orders and species from Central Italy. A total of 53 (17.67%) samples were PCR positive for at least one investigated pathogen. One (0.33%) bird was positive for Bartonella spp., five (1.67%) birds were positive for C. burnetii, eleven (3.67%) for B. burgdorferi s.l., and thirty-six (12%) for C. psittaci. No coinfection was detected. All samples were negative for A. phagocytophilum, E. canis, F. tularensis, and Rickettsia spp. The findings showed that wild birds may harbor different zoonotic tick-borne bacteria; therefore, they can contribute to the diffusion of these agents.