# Attentional Bias for Opioids in Taiwanese Heavy Smokers with Chronic Noncancer Pain

## TL;DR

This study examines attentional bias toward opioids in Taiwanese heavy smokers with chronic pain and finds differences compared to Western populations.

## Contribution

The study investigates attentional bias for opioids in a Taiwanese population, revealing unique patterns not previously observed in Western samples.

## Key findings

- Chronic pain nonsmokers showed attentional bias for short-displayed opioid cues.
- Smokers without pain responded faster in the visual probe task.
- Formulary and regulatory factors may influence opioid perception in Taiwan.

## Abstract

Background and Objectives: Attentional bias (AB) for addictive substances is a feature of attention found in individuals with substance misuse or diagnosed with substance use disorders. When AB exists, the attention of the addicted individual may be quickly oriented to cues related to the addictive substance or be maintained on these cues for a longer time. AB toward opioids was found in Western samples of smokers with chronic noncancer pain. The level of AB was dose-responsive. However, similar studies in the Taiwanese population are lacking. This study compared the patterns of AB for opioid analgesics in Taiwanese participants with chronic noncancer pain to that of individuals without pain. This study aimed to investigate if AB toward opioids is presented in Taiwanese heavy smokers who are on long-term opioid therapy for pain control. Materials and Methods: Participants were grouped into chronic noncancer pain smokers, chronic pain nonsmokers, and smokers without pain, according to smoking habits and whether or not on long-term opioid therapy for pain control. Each participant completed demographic questionnaires, mood scales, and the opioid-related visual probe task. Differences in AB among the groups were compared using a three-way analysis of covariance controlling for daily cigarette consumption. Results: Chronic noncancer pain smokers (n = 17) and chronic pain nonsmokers (n = 16) displayed more severe levels of depression, anxiety, and pain, compared to smokers without pain (n = 28). Only did chronic pain nonsmokers show significant AB for opioid cues that were displayed for a short time. Analysis on reaction time found that smokers without pain consistently responded faster to the tasks. No difference in reaction time was found between the pain groups. Conclusions: The current study did not fully replicate findings from studies that were based in Western countries. Formulary availability and regulatory limitations might have affected patient’s perception of prescription opioids in Taiwan. However, chronic pain nonsmokers exhibited initial orientation toward opioid-related cues when daily cigarette consumption was accounted for. According to previous research, this AB for shortly displayed opioid cues can be associated with the expectation of pain relief. The current finding also indicated general psychomotor retardation in individuals who were on long-term use of opioids.