# Construct Validity of the Athlete Introductory Movement Screen in Grassroots Footballers Aged 11–13 Years

**Authors:** Michael J Duncan, Matteo Crotti, Ricardo Martins, Lucas Guimaraes-Ferreira, Jason Tallis, William Pattison

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/children11070879 · Children · 2024-07-19

## TL;DR

This study shows that the Athlete Introductory Movement Screen (AIMS) is a valid tool for assessing movement skills in children aged 11–13 years.

## Contribution

The study provides evidence for the construct validity of AIMS in grassroots footballers aged 11–13.

## Key findings

- Girls with medium movement skills had higher motor competence scores than those with low skills.
- Boys with high movement skills had significantly higher motor competence scores than those with low or medium skills.
- AIMS differentiates movement skill levels, supporting its validity as a measure of motor competence.

## Abstract

Background: This study examined the construct validity of the Athlete Introductory Movement Screen (AIMS) in children. Methods: Following ethics approval, parental consent, and child assent, 87 children (50 boys, 37 girls) aged 11–13 years (Mean ± SD = 12.4 ± 0.6 years) performed the AIMS and Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD-3) in a counterbalanced order. AIMS tertiles were subsequently created, classifying children with ‘high’, ‘medium’, or ‘low’ movement skills. Results: A 2 (Gender) X 3 (AIMS tertile) ways analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), controlling for age and age at peak height velocity, with TGMD-3 scores as the dependant variable, indicated that TGMD-3 scores were significantly higher for girls categorised as having a medium movement skill compared to girls categorised as low, and those categorised having high movement skill compared to medium and low movement skill groups (all, p = 0.001). There was no difference in TGMD-3 scores for boys classed as having low and medium movement skills. Boys categorised as high for movement skills had significantly greater TGMD-3 scores than their peers categorised as having both low and medium movement skills (p = 0.001). Conclusions: As the AIMS differentiates the theoretically related construct of motor competence, this study demonstrates that the AIMS has construct validity as a measure of movement skill in children aged 11–13 years.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** TGMD-3 (MESH:C537153)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11275011/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11275011/full.md

## References

30 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11275011/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11275011