# Do Moral Emotions Interact with Self-Control and Unstructured Socializing in Explaining Rule-Breaking Behavior Committed Together with Friends?

## TL;DR

This study explores how moral emotions, self-control, and socializing with friends influence rule-breaking behavior among adolescents.

## Contribution

The study introduces three operationalizations of moral emotions and examines their role in rule-breaking with friends.

## Key findings

- High anticipated emotions in moral conflicts reduce the impact of low self-control on rule-breaking.
- Guilt- and shame-proneness increase the influence of unstructured socializing on rule-breaking with friends.
- The study highlights the importance of moral emotions in understanding adolescent behavior.

## Abstract

Previous research has shown that moral emotions interact with self-control and unstructured socializing in explaining rule-breaking behavior. High levels of moral emotions appear to weaken the effects of both self-control and unstructured socializing, in explaining rule-breaking behavior. The current study examined whether these interactions also affect rule-breaking behavior that is explicitly committed with friends. In addition, three operationalizations of moral emotions were distinguished. Data were collected from N = 169 adolescents (54% female; mean = 14.95 years; SD = 1.7) using a self-report questionnaire battery. Results indicate that high levels of anticipated emotions in moral conflicts (AEMC) attenuate the effect of low self-control on one’s own rule-breaking behavior. In contrast, high levels of both guilt- and shame-proneness enhanced the effect of unstructured socializing on one’s own and rule-breaking with friends. The limitations of the study, ideas for future research, and practical implications are also discussed.