# Giving It a Shot with a Different Approach: Prosocial Strategies Moderate the Joint Effects of Agentic and Communal Goals on Bullying

## TL;DR

This study explores how prosocial strategies affect bullying linked to agentic and communal goals among Chinese adolescents.

## Contribution

The study introduces a non-pathological perspective on bullying by examining the moderating role of prosocial strategies.

## Key findings

- Higher agentic and lower communal goals are linked to increased bullying.
- Prosocial strategies reduce bullying when both goals are high.
- Bullying rises linearly for those with low prosocial strategies regardless of social goals.

## Abstract

This study uses polynomial regression and response surface analyses to investigate the joint effects of agentic and communal goals on bullying and the moderating role of prosocial strategies. The sample included 917 adolescents (Mage = 13.54, SD = 1.02) from rural, suburban, and urban areas in China. The findings revealed that higher agentic and lower communal goals were associated with a linear rise in bullying. Surprisingly, when both social goals were higher simultaneously, bullying followed an inverted U-shaped pattern. Furthermore, prosocial strategies moderated the joint effects of the two social goals. Adolescents who are more likely to use prosocial strategies do not show significant changes in bullying when both goals are at a higher level. In contrast, those who are less likely to do so show a linear rise in bullying, regardless of changes in social goals. This study improves our understanding and intervention of bullying behavior, emphasizing a non-pathological perspective.