# Interstitial Lung Disease: Comparing Lecture and Large Group Case-Based Learning for Preclinical Medical Students

**Authors:** Juliana Cazzaniga, Matthew Shatanof, Gagani Athauda, Jenny Fortun, Amilcar Castellano, Juan Lozano, Rebecca Toonkel

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63100 · Cureus · 2024-06-25

## TL;DR

This study compares lecture-based and case-based learning methods for teaching interstitial lung disease to preclinical medical students.

## Contribution

The study introduces a team-based case-based learning approach for teaching interstitial lung disease and evaluates its effectiveness.

## Key findings

- Students using case-based learning scored higher on final exam questions about interstitial lung disease.
- Student satisfaction with the case-based learning session was acceptable but not high.

## Abstract

Introduction and objective

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a subject with which preclinical medical students often struggle. Because case-based learning (CBL) engages students in discussions centered around complex clinical scenarios, it may be effective for teaching ILD to preclinical medical students by fostering the development of critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills.

Methods

Lecture-based learning on ILD in the second-year Respiratory System course was replaced with a large group CBL session. Students worked in a large group team-based CBL (TB-CBL) to answer questions about the etiology, presentation, diagnostic radiology images, pathophysiology, and management of various ILDs. Performance on ILD-related final exam questions from Cohort A (Class of 2023, lecture) was compared with Cohort B (Class of 2025, TB-CBL). Student satisfaction was assessed through an anonymous end-of-course survey (5-point Likert).

Results

Mean performance on ILD-related final exam questions was 85.4 (SD: 16.5) for Cohort B (TB-CBL) vs. 80.0 (SD: 17.6) for Cohort A (lecture). Mean overall satisfaction was 3.31 (SD: 1.37), with 87.6%, 88.4%, and 87.6% agreeing or strongly agreeing with the statements “The session was well organized,” “The session contributed to my learning,” and “The session was a valuable use of my time,” respectively.

Conclusion

Students participating in TB-CBL scored higher on ILD-related final exam questions compared with those who received lecture-based learning of the same material. Student satisfaction was acceptable but lower than expected. This TB-CBL session may be adapted at other institutions aiming to utilize active learning methods to teach the principles of diagnosis and management of ILD to preclinical medical students.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** Interstitial Lung Disease (MONDO:0015925)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** ILD (MESH:D017563)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11272146/full.md

## References

19 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11272146/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11272146