# An in silico investigation on the binding site preference of PD-1 and PD-L1 for designing antibodies for targeted cancer therapy

## TL;DR

This study uses computer modeling to identify optimal binding sites on PD-1 and PD-L1 proteins for designing antibodies that can block cancer's immune evasion strategy.

## Contribution

The study introduces a large-scale in silico approach to identify and optimize antibody binding sites on PD-1 and PD-L1 for immune checkpoint inhibition.

## Key findings

- Binding sites 1, 3, and 6 on PD-1 and 9 and 11 on PD-L1 are optimal for antibody inhibition.
- Antibody designs with mutations in CDR regions show improved affinity and interaction patterns.
- In silico methods effectively identify stable and high-affinity antibody variants for immune checkpoint blockade.

## Abstract

Cancer control and treatment remain a significant challenge in cancer therapy and recently immune checkpoints has considered as a novel treatment strategy to develop anti-cancer drugs. Many cancer types use the immune checkpoints and its ligand, PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, to evade detection and destruction by the immune system, which is associated with altered effector function of PD-1 and PD-L1 overexpression on cancer cells to deactivate T cells. In recent years, mAbs have been employed to block immune checkpoints, therefore normalization of the anti-tumor response has enabled the scientists to develop novel biopharmaceuticals. In vivo affinity maturation of antibodies in targeted therapy has sometimes failed, and current experimental methods cannot accommodate the accurate structural details of protein-protein interactions. Therefore, determining favorable binding sites on the protein surface for modulator design of these interactions is a major challenge. In this study, we used the in silico methods to identify favorable binding sites on the PD-1 and PD-L1 and to optimize mAb variants on a large scale. At first, all the binding areas on PD-1 and PD-L1 have been identified. Then, using the RosettaDesign protocol, thousands of antibodies have been generated for 11 different regions on PD-1 and PD-L1 and then the designs with higher stability, affinity, and shape complementarity were selected. Next, molecular dynamics simulations and MM-PBSA analysis were employed to understand the dynamic, structural features of the complexes and measure the binding affinity of the final designs. Our results suggest that binding sites 1, 3 and 6 on PD-1 and binding sites 9 and 11 on PD-L1 can be regarded as the most appropriate sites for the inhibition of PD-1-PD-L1 interaction by the designed antibodies. This study provides comprehensive information regarding the potential binding epitopes on PD-1 which could be considered as hotspots for designing potential biopharmaceuticals. We also showed that mutations in the CDRs regions will rearrange the interaction pattern between the designed antibodies and targets (PD-1 and PD-L1) with improved affinity to effectively inhibit protein-protein interaction and block the immune checkpoint.