Perceptions and digitalisation of outbreak management in UK health services: A cross-sectional survey

TL;DR

A survey of UK health services reveals mixed perceptions and limited digitalization in managing infectious disease outbreaks.

Contribution

The study provides novel insights into IPC practitioners' perceptions and digitalization levels in UK outbreak management.

Findings

IPC practitioners show positive perceptions of outbreak management stages but express concerns about surveillance and communication.

Digitalization of outbreak management relies on basic tools like Excel and Word, limiting retrospective learning.

Nine out of ten NHS trusts provided data, revealing challenges like poor surveillance and delayed outbreak detection.

Abstract

Global challenges arise from infectious diseases which represent significant challenges to the provision of healthcare, requiring efficient management procedures to limit transmission. Evaluating current outbreak management processes within UK healthcare services is essential for identifying strengths, weaknesses, and potential improvements.

This study aimed to assess infection prevention and control (IPC) practitioners' access to outbreak management (OM) data. Secondary objectives involved determining IPC practitioners’ perceptions of outbreak management processes and the state of digitalisation of OM in the UK.

National cross-sectional survey data were collected to evaluate current outbreak management approaches. To supplement this, information requests were sent to the 10 largest teaching and research NHS hospital trusts in England.

The survey received 55 responses with 53 considered for analysis. Out of 10 NHS trusts, nine provided completed FOI responses, while one was unable to provide data.

The study offers unique insights into prevailing outbreak management practices within UK health services. Although positive perceptions surround key outbreak management stages, concerns arise, including varying confidence levels in surveillance processes' robustness, efficacy of management interventions, and communication effectiveness.

The study highlights challenges with OM processes in the UK, including issues like poor surveillance and delayed outbreak detection. Positive practitioner perceptions contrast with concerns over data collection, follow-up, and limited digitalisation, relying on basic tools like Excel and Word, hindering retrospective learning.

Figures