Correction: On prediction of aided behavioural measures using speech auditory brainstem responses and decision trees
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpeech and Audio Processing · Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Neuroscience and Music Perception
In the Abstract, there is an error in the ninth sentence of the paragraph. The correct sentence is: In the VCV trees, performance was predicted by the aided F0 encoding latency and the aided amplitude of peak VA in quiet for participants with PTAs ≥ 47 dB HL.
In the Results, there is an error in the third sentence of the paragraph. The correct sentence is: The regression trees for the BKB-SIN are shown in Fig 2, for the VCV in Fig 4, for the SSQ-Speech in Fig 5.
In the BKB-SIN trees subsection of the Results, there is an error in the fifth sentence of the paragraph. The correct sentence is: Fig 3 shows the relationship between BKB-SIN, PTA and aided latency of peak F.
The captions for Figs 3–5 are incorrectly switched. The correct captions have been provided here:
The publisher apologizes for the errors.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.