Evaluation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging features and diagnostic effectiveness of grades II and III intracranial solitary fibroma

TL;DR

This study shows that preoperative MRI features, especially ADCmin values, can help distinguish between grades II and III intracranial solitary fibrous tumors.

Contribution

The study identifies ADCmin as a significant predictor for grading ISFT using preoperative MRI, improving diagnostic accuracy.

Findings

Grade III ISFT showed more mixed T2-FLAIR and DWI signal characteristics compared to grade II.

ADCmin had an AUC of 0.805, with 74.1% sensitivity and 75.0% specificity for grading ISFT.

The model including ADCmin achieved 89.1% accuracy in differentiating grades II and III ISFT.

Abstract

To explore the value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characterization of intracranial solitary fibrous tumors (ISFT) and to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative MRI features in predicting pathological grading.

This retrospective analysis comprised the clinical and preoperative MRI characterization of 55 patients with ISFT in our hospital, including 27 grade II cases and 28 grade III cases confirmed by postoperative pathology. Variables included age, sex, tumor location, cross-midline status, signal characteristics of T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR), and diffusion‑weighted imaging (DWI), peritumoral edema, intralesional hemorrhage, focal necrosis/cystic degeneration, tumor empty vessel, maximum tumor diameter, maximum, minimum, and average values of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmax, ADCmin, and ADCmean), tumors enhancement mode, meningeal tail sign, skull invasion, cerebral parenchymal invasion, and venous sinus involvement. The independent samples t test or Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare continuous data between the two groups, and the Pearson chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical data. In addition, bivariate logistic regression was performed to construct a comprehensive model, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to calculate the areas under the curve (AUCs), thereby determining the value of each parameter in the differential diagnosis of grades II and III ISFT.

The mean age at onset was similar between patients with grades II and III ISFT (46.77 ± 14.66 years and 45.82 ± 12.07 years, respectively). The proportions of men among patients with grades II and III ISFT were slightly higher than those of female patients (male/female: 1.25 [15/12] and 1.33 [16/12], respectively). There were significant differences between grades II and III ISFT in the T2-FLAIR and DWI signal characteristics, maximum, minimum, and average values of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmax, ADCmin, and ADCmean), tumor location, and skull invasion (P = 0.001, P = 0.018, P = 0.000, P = 0.000, P = 0.000, P = 0.010, and P = 0.032, respectively). However, no significant differences were noted between grades II and III ISFT in age, sex, cross-midline status, T1WI and T2WI signal characteristics, peritumoral edema, intralesional hemorrhage, focal necrosis/cystic degeneration, tumor empty vessel shadow, enhancement mode, meningeal tail sign, maximum tumor diameter, brain parenchyma invasion, or venous sinus involvement (all P > 0.05). Moreover, binary logistic regression analysis showed that the model accuracy was 89.1% when ADCmin was included in the regression equation. Moreover, ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of ADCmin was 0.805 (0.688, 0.922), sensitivity was 74.1%, specificity was 75.0%, and the cutoff value was 672 mm2/s.

Grade III ISFT patients displayed more mixed T2-FLAIR signal characteristics and DWI signal characteristics than grade II patients, as shown by higher skull invasion and tumor mass collapse midline distribution and lower ADCmax, ADCmean, and ADCmin values. The ADCmin value was significant in the preoperative assignment of grades II and III ISFT, thereby contributing to enhanced accuracy in the imaging grading diagnosis of the disease.

Figures