# Effect of hydrofluoric acid concentration and aging on the bond strength ceramics to a resin cement

**Authors:** Bruno Delgado Clerot, Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho, Milena Bandini, Evaldo Pinheiro, Fernanda Midori Tsuzuki, Rafael Rocha Pacheco, Ana Rosa Costa

PMC · DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440202405669 · 2024-07-22

## TL;DR

This study found that hydrofluoric acid concentration and thermal cycling affect the bond strength of resin cement to ceramics, but the ceramic brand does not.

## Contribution

The study introduces new insights into how HF concentration and aging impact bond strength in dental ceramics.

## Key findings

- Hydrofluoric acid concentration significantly affects microshear bond strength.
- Thermal cycling significantly reduces microshear bond strength.
- Ceramic brand does not significantly influence bond strength.

## Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of hydrofluoric acid (HF) concentration and thermal cycling on the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of a resin luting agent to IPS e.max® CAD and Rosetta® SM. Ceramic specimens (12.0 x 14.0 x 1.5mm) were randomized into 8 groups (n=10) according to HF concentration, commercial brand, and aging. Immediately after polishing, and etching, all specimens were silanized and a layer of adhesive was applied. A PVS mold of 3 mm thickness and 10mm diameter with (four) 1.0mm holes was fabricated, placed on each specimen, and then filled with a resin luting agent. Half of the specimens were subjected to the µSBS test using an Instron at a speed of 1.0 mm/min, following a 24-hour storage in deionized water at 37ºC. The remaining specimens were subjected to thermal cycling (5ºC-55ºC, 30 seconds per bath) and µSBS. The data were evaluated utilizing a three-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (α=0.05). Significant differences were found for HF concentration and aging (p<0.0001). No significant difference in µSBS was found for commercial brands (p=0.085). The interaction between brand and HF concentration (p=0.358), brand and aging (p=0.135), and HF concentration and aging (p=0.138) were not statistically significant. The triple interaction among these factors was not statistically significant (p=0.610). In conclusion, the bond strength is affected by the HF concentration. No statistical difference was observed between the two ceramics. Thermal cycling significantly reduced µSBS.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** hydrofluoric acid (PubChem CID 14917), deionized water (PubChem CID 962)

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11262762/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11262762