Accurate Prediction of Three-Dimensional Humanoid Avatars for Anthropometric Modeling

TL;DR

This paper shows that 3D human avatars predicted using simple measurements like age, weight, and body fat can accurately represent body dimensions, matching those from detailed 3D scans.

Contribution

The novel contribution is demonstrating that manifold regression can predict accurate 3D avatars using accessible clinical data without requiring 3D scanning.

Findings

High correlations (R² 0.75–0.99) between predicted and ground-truth anthropometric measurements.

Concordance correlation coefficients ranged from 0.80–0.99 with small bias in most measurements.

Mean waist-to-hip ratio predictions were non-significantly different from actual measurements.

Abstract

To evaluate the hypothesis that anthropometric dimensions derived from a person’s manifold-regression predicted three-dimensional (3D) humanoid avatar are accurate when compared to their actual circumference, volume, and surface area measurements acquired with a ground-truth 3D optical imaging method. Avatars predicted using this approach, if accurate with respect to anthropometric dimensions, can serve multiple purposes including patient metabolic disease risk stratification in clinical settings.

Manifold regression 3D avatar prediction equations were developed on a sample of 570 adults who completed 3D optical scans, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and bioimpedance analysis (BIA) evaluations. A new prospective sample of 84 adults had ground-truth measurements of 6 body circumferences, 7 volumes, and 7 surface areas with a 20-camera 3D reference scanner. 3D humanoid avatars were generated on these participants with manifold regression including age, weight, height, DXA %fat, and BIA impedances as potential predictor variables. Ground-truth and predicted avatar anthropometric dimensions were quantified with the same software.

Following exploratory studies, one manifold prediction model was moved forward for presentation that included age, weight, height, and %fat as covariates. Predicted and ground-truth avatars had similar visual appearances; correlations between predicted and ground-truth anthropometric estimates were all high (R2s, 0.75–0.99; all p < 0.001) with non-significant mean differences except for arm circumferences (%D ~ 5%; p < 0.05). Concordance correlation coefficients ranged from 0.80–0.99 and small but significant bias (p < 0.05 – 0.01) was present with Bland-Altman plots in 13 of 20 total anthropometric measurements. The mean waist to hip circumference ratio predicted by manifold regression was non-significantly different from ground-truth scanner measurements.

3D avatars predicted from demographic, physical, and other accessible characteristics can produce body representations with accurate anthropometric dimensions without a 3D scanner. Combining manifold regression algorithms into established body composition methods such as DXA, BIA, and other accessible methods provides new research and clinical opportunities.

Figures