The genome sequence of a hoverfly, Pocota personata (Harris, 1780)
Steven Falk, Katie J. Woodcock, Pablo Aguado-Aranda, Annabel Whibley

TL;DR
This paper reports the genome sequence of the hoverfly Pocota personata, including a detailed assembly of its chromosomes and mitochondrial genome.
Contribution
The novel contribution is the genome assembly of Pocota personata, including chromosomal scaffolding and mitochondrial genome sequencing.
Findings
The genome assembly spans 845.2 megabases and includes 5 chromosomal pseudomolecules.
The mitochondrial genome is 16.04 kilobases long and has been fully assembled.
Abstract
We present a genome assembly from an individual male Pocota personata (a hoverfly; Arthropoda; Insecta; Diptera; Syrphidae). The genome sequence is 845.2 megabases in span. Most of the assembly is scaffolded into 5 chromosomal pseudomolecules, including the X sex chromosome. The mitochondrial genome has also been assembled and is 16.04 kilobases in length.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5| Project accession data | ||
|---|---|---|
| Assembly identifier | idPocPers1.1 | |
| Species |
| |
| Specimen | idPocPers1 | |
| NCBI taxonomy ID | 2867115 | |
| BioProject | PRJEB61333 | |
| BioSample ID | SAMEA10167087 | |
| Isolate information | idPocPers1, male: abdomen (DNA), head (Hi-C data) | |
| Assembly metrics
|
| |
| Consensus quality (QV) | 61.0 |
|
|
| 100% |
|
| BUSCO
| C:97.2%[S:96.7%,D:0.5%],F:0.7%,M:2.1%,n:3,285 |
|
| Percentage of assembly mapped to chromosomes | 98.27% |
|
| Sex chromosomes | X chromosome |
|
| Organelles | Mitochondrial genome assembled |
|
| Raw data accessions | ||
| PacificBiosciences SEQUEL II | ERR11242125 | |
| Hi-C Illumina | ERR11242538 | |
| Genome assembly | ||
| Assembly accession | GCA_963082735.1 | |
|
| GCA_963083005.1 | |
| Span (Mb) | 845.2 | |
| Number of contigs | 907 | |
| Contig N50 length (Mb) | 2.9 | |
| Number of scaffolds | 265 | |
| Scaffold N50 length (Mb) | 247.6 | |
| Longest scaffold (Mb) | 279.4 | |
| INSDC
| Chromosome | Length (Mb) | GC% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 279.39 | 38.5 | |
| 2 | 247.56 | 38.0 | |
| 3 | 147.65 | 38.5 | |
| 4 | 123.74 | 38.0 | |
| X | 32.32 | 38.5 | |
| MT | 0.02 | 19.5 |
| Software
| Version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| BlobToolKit | 4.2.1 |
|
| BUSCO | 5.3.2 |
|
| Hifiasm | 0.16.1-r375 |
|
| HiGlass | 1.11.6 |
|
| Merqury | MerquryFK |
|
| MitoHiFi | 3 |
|
| PretextView | 0.2 |
|
| purge_dups | 1.2.5 |
|
| sanger-tol/
| v1.0 |
|
| sanger-tol/
| 1.1.0 |
|
| YaHS | 1.2a.2 |
|
- —Wellcome Trust
- —Wellcome Trust
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDiptera species taxonomy and behavior · Fossil Insects in Amber · Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Species taxonomy
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Eumetazoa; Bilateria; Protostomia; Ecdysozoa; Panarthropoda; Arthropoda; Mandibulata; Pancrustacea; Hexapoda; Insecta; Dicondylia; Pterygota; Neoptera; Endopterygota; Diptera; Brachycera; Muscomorpha; Eremoneura; Cyclorrhapha; Aschiza; Syrphoidea; Syrphidae; Eristalinae; Milesiini; Pocota; Pocota personata (Harris, 1780) (NCBI:txid2867115).
Background
Pocota personata (Harris, 1780) is a European woodland hoverfly species, in the UK records are predominantly associated with wooded areas rich in dead and decaying trees in southern England, though it has been found as far north as North Yorkshire and County Durham ( Ball & Morris, 2000; Ball & Morris, 2015; Stubbs & Falk, 2002; van Veen, 2014). It is described as a rare hoverfly throughout Europe with the majority of UK records existing between the months of April to August and a peak in numbers occurring during mid to late May ( Ball & Morris, 2000; Ball & Morris, 2015; Stubbs & Falk, 2002). As larvae, P. personata are dark in colour and preferentially occupy elevated beech and poplar tree rot holes, activities relating to ‘forest hygiene’ including clearing of rotting logs and dead trees and filling of rot holes have been common practice in the past and may have impacted this species ( Gandy, 2019; Rotheray, 1993; Stubbs & Falk, 2002). As adults P. personata are stocky bumblebee mimics, known for acoustic and behavioural mimicry through production of a distinctively loud buzz as well as repeated lifting of a hind leg if disturbed ( Ball & Morris, 2015; Gandy, 2019; Stubbs & Falk, 2002). Adults possess two unique recognisable features setting them aside from other Syrphid bumblebee mimics, firstly a disproportionately small head, measuring approximately half the thorax width and additionally the presence of prominent bright yellow hairs on the thorax and abdomen ( Ball & Morris, 2015). Flower visitation appears to be an occasional behaviour in P. personata, though it has been spotted visiting umbellifers, hawthorn and apple trees during the late afternoon and early evening ( Ball & Morris, 2015; Stubbs & Falk, 2002). The completed genome sequence for Pocota personata is an important resource in aiding the future study of this scarce and poorly understood hoverfly species.
Genome sequence report
The genome was sequenced from one male Pocota personata ( Figure 1) collected from Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire, UK (51.76, –1.33). A total of 30-fold coverage in Pacific Biosciences single-molecule HiFi long reads was generated. Primary assembly contigs were scaffolded with chromosome conformation Hi-C data. Manual assembly curation corrected 108 missing joins or mis-joins and removed one haplotypic duplication, reducing the scaffold number by 22.22%, and increasing the scaffold N50 by 158.88%.
Photograph of the Pocota personata (idPocPers1) specimen used for genome sequencing.
The final assembly has a total length of 845.2 Mb in 265 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 247.6 Mb ( Table 1). The snailplot in Figure 2 provides a summary of the assembly statistics, while the distribution of assembly scaffolds on GC proportion and coverage is shown in Figure 3. The cumulative assembly plot in Figure 4 shows curves for subsets of scaffolds assigned to different phyla. Most (98.27%) of the assembly sequence was assigned to 5 chromosomal-level scaffolds, 4 autosomes and the X sex chromosome. Chromosome X was identified by read coverage statistics. No Y was identified. The species is thought to be XO. Chromosome-scale scaffolds confirmed by the Hi-C data are named in order of size ( Figure 5; Table 2). While not fully phased, the assembly deposited is of one haplotype. Contigs corresponding to the second haplotype have also been deposited. The mitochondrial genome was also assembled and can be found as a contig within the multifasta file of the genome submission.
Table 1.: Genome data for Pocota personata, idPocPers1.1.
Genome assembly of Pocota personata, idPocPers1.1: metrics.The BlobToolKit Snailplot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. The main plot is divided into 1,000 size-ordered bins around the circumference with each bin representing 0.1% of the 845,253,571 bp assembly. The distribution of scaffold lengths is shown in dark grey with the plot radius scaled to the longest scaffold present in the assembly (279,389,706 bp, shown in red). Orange and pale-orange arcs show the N50 and N90 scaffold lengths (247,560,496 and 123,742,089 bp), respectively. The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative scaffold count on a log scale with white scale lines showing successive orders of magnitude. The blue and pale-blue area around the outside of the plot shows the distribution of GC, AT and N percentages in the same bins as the inner plot. A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated and missing BUSCO genes in the diptera_odb10 set is shown in the top right. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Pocota%20personata/dataset/CAUJBT01/snail.
Genome assembly of Pocota personata, idPocPers1.1: BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot.Scaffolds are coloured by phylum. Circles are sized in proportion to scaffold length. Histograms show the distribution of scaffold length sum along each axis. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Pocota%20personata/dataset/CAUJBT01/blob.
Genome assembly of Pocota personata, idPocPers1.1: BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot.The grey line shows cumulative length for all scaffolds. Coloured lines show cumulative lengths of scaffolds assigned to each phylum using the buscogenes taxrule. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Pocota%20personata/dataset/CAUJBT01/cumulative.
Genome assembly of Pocota personata, idPocPers1.1: Hi-C contact map of the idPocPers1.1 assembly, visualised using HiGlass.Chromosomes are shown in order of size from left to right and top to bottom. An interactive version of this figure may be viewed at https://genome-note-higlass.tol.sanger.ac.uk/l/?d=Ikse1PuTTceSUbllW6lsUQ.
Table 2.: Chromosomal pseudomolecules in the genome assembly of Pocota personata, idPocPers1.
The estimated Quality Value (QV) of the final assembly is 61.0 with k-mer completeness of 100%, and the assembly has a BUSCO v5.3.2 completeness of 97.2% (single = 96.7%, duplicated = 0.5%), using the diptera_odb10 reference set ( n = 3,285).
Metadata for specimens, barcode results, spectra estimates, sequencing runs, contaminants and pre-curation assembly statistics are given at https://links.tol.sanger.ac.uk/species/2867115.
Methods
Sample acquisition and nucleic acid extraction
A male Pocota personata (specimen ID Ox001535, ToLID idPocPers1) was netted in Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire (biological vice-country Berkshire), UK (latitude 51.76, longitude –1.33) on 2021-05-31. The specimen was collected and identified by Steven Falk (University of Oxford) and preserved on dry ice.
High molecular weight (HMW) DNA was extracted at the Tree of Life laboratory, Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI), following a sequence of core procedures: sample preparation; sample homogenisation; HMW DNA extraction; DNA fragmentation; and DNA clean-up. The idPocPers1sample was weighed and dissected on dry ice (as per the protocol https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.x54v9prmqg3e/v1). The abdomen of the idPocPers1 sample was homogenised using a Nippi Powermasher fitted with a BioMasher pestle, following the protocol at https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.5qpvo3r19v4o/v1. DNA was extracted by means of the HMW DNA Extraction: Automated MagAttract protocol ( https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.kxygx3y4dg8j/v1). HMW DNA was sheared into an average fragment size of 12–20 kb in a Megaruptor 3 system with speed setting 30, following the HMW DNA Fragmentation: Diagenode Megaruptor ^®^3 for PacBio HiFi protocol ( https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.8epv5x2zjg1b/v1). Sheared DNA was purified using Manual solid-phase reversible immobilisation (SPRI) (protocol at https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.kxygx3y1dg8j/v1). In brief, the method employs a 1.8X ratio of AMPure PB beads to sample to eliminate shorter fragments and concentrate the DNA. The concentration of the sheared and purified DNA was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer and Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit. Fragment size distribution was evaluated by running the sample on the FemtoPulse system.
Protocols developed by the Tree of Life laboratory are publicly available on protocols.io: https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.8epv5xxy6g1b/v1.
Sequencing
Pacific Biosciences HiFi circular consensus DNA sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. DNA sequencing was performed by the Scientific Operations core at the WSI on a Pacific Biosciences SEQUEL II instrument. Hi-C data were also generated from head tissue of idPocPers1 using the Arima2 kit and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument.
Genome assembly, curation and evaluation
Assembly was carried out with Hifiasm ( Cheng et al., 2021) and haplotypic duplication was identified and removed with purge_dups ( Guan et al., 2020). The assembly was then scaffolded with Hi-C data ( Rao et al., 2014) using YaHS ( Zhou et al., 2023). The assembly was checked for contamination and corrected as described previously ( Howe et al., 2021). Manual curation was performed using HiGlass ( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018) and Pretext ( Harry, 2022). The mitochondrial genome was assembled using MitoHiFi ( Uliano-Silva et al., 2023), which runs MitoFinder ( Allio et al., 2020) or MITOS ( Bernt et al., 2013) and uses these annotations to select the final mitochondrial contig and to ensure the general quality of the sequence.
A Hi-C map for the final assembly was produced using bwa-mem2 ( Vasimuddin et al., 2019) in the Cooler file format ( Abdennur & Mirny, 2020). To assess the assembly metrics, the k-mer completeness and QV consensus quality values were calculated in Merqury ( Rhie et al., 2020). This work was done using Nextflow ( Di Tommaso et al., 2017) DSL2 pipelines “sanger-tol/readmapping” ( Surana et al., 2023a) and “sanger-tol/genomenote” ( Surana et al., 2023b). The genome was analysed within the BlobToolKit environment ( Challis et al., 2020) and BUSCO scores ( Manni et al., 2021; Simão et al., 2015) were calculated.
Table 3 contains a list of relevant software tool versions and sources.
Wellcome Sanger Institute – Legal and Governance
The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner. The submission of materials by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner is subject to the ‘Darwin Tree of Life Project Sampling Code of Practice’, which can be found in full on the Darwin Tree of Life website here. By agreeing with and signing up to the Sampling Code of Practice, the Darwin Tree of Life Partner agrees they will meet the legal and ethical requirements and standards set out within this document in respect of all samples acquired for, and supplied to, the Darwin Tree of Life Project.
Further, the Wellcome Sanger Institute employs a process whereby due diligence is carried out proportionate to the nature of the materials themselves, and the circumstances under which they have been/are to be collected and provided for use. The purpose of this is to address and mitigate any potential legal and/or ethical implications of receipt and use of the materials as part of the research project, and to ensure that in doing so we align with best practice wherever possible. The overarching areas of consideration are:
• Ethical review of provenance and sourcing of the material
• Legality of collection, transfer and use (national and international)
Each transfer of samples is further undertaken according to a Research Collaboration Agreement or Material Transfer Agreement entered into by the Darwin Tree of Life Partner, Genome Research Limited (operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute), and in some circumstances other Darwin Tree of Life collaborators.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Abdennur N Mirny LA : Cooler: Scalable storage for Hi-C data and other genomically labeled arrays. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(1):311–316. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz 540 31290943 PMC 8205516 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Allio R Schomaker‐Bastos A Romiguier J : Mito Finder: Efficient automated large‐scale extraction of mitogenomic data in target enrichment phylogenomics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020;20(4):892–905. 10.1111/1755-0998.13160 32243090 PMC 7497042 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Ball S Morris R : Britain’s Hoverflies: A Field Guide - Revised and Updated Second Edition.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,2015. Reference Source
- 4Ball SG Morris RKA : Provisional atlas of British hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae).Biological Records Centre, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology,2000. Reference Source
- 5Bernt M Donath A Jühling F : MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;69(2):313–319. 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023 22982435 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Challis R Richards E Rajan J : Blob Tool Kit - interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G 3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(4):1361–1374. 10.1534/g 3.119.400908 32071071 PMC 7144090 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Cheng H Concepcion GT Feng X : Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021;18(2):170–175. 10.1038/s 41592-020-01056-5 33526886 PMC 7961889 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Di Tommaso P Chatzou M Floden EW : Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(4):316–319. 10.1038/nbt.3820 28398311 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
