Correlation of RANK and RANKL with mammographic density in primary breast cancer patients
Marius Wunderle, Felix Heindl, Annika S. Behrens, Lothar Häberle, Carolin C. Hack, Katharina Heusinger, Hanna Huebner, Paul Gass, Matthias Ruebner, Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland, Ramona Erber, Arndt Hartmann, Matthias W. Beckmann, William C. Dougall, Michael F. Press

TL;DR
This study found no link between RANK and RANKL protein levels in breast cancer tumors and mammographic density, a known cancer risk factor.
Contribution
The novel contribution is the first investigation of RANK and RANKL expression in relation to mammographic density in primary breast cancer patients.
Findings
No association was found between RANK/RANKL expression and mammographic density (PMD).
RANK expression varied by tumor subtype, highest in triple-negative breast cancer.
No subtype-specific pattern was observed for RANKL expression.
Abstract
The receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK) and its ligand (RANKL) have been shown to promote proliferation of the breast and breast carcinogenesis. The objective of this analysis was to investigate whether tumor-specific RANK and RANKL expression in patients with primary breast cancer is associated with high percentage mammographic density (PMD), which is a known breast cancer risk factor. Immunohistochemical staining of RANK and RANKL was performed in tissue microarrays (TMAs) from primary breast cancer samples of the Bavarian Breast Cancer Cases and Controls (BBCC) study. For RANK and RANKL expression, histochemical scores (H scores) with a cut-off value of > 0 vs 0 were established. PMD was measured in the contralateral, non-diseased breast. Linear regression models with PMD as outcome were calculated using common predictors of PMD (age at breast cancer diagnosis, body…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistorical Astronomy and Related Studies · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Historical and Architectural Studies
