Efficacy of Faculty Development Training Workshops (FDTWs) on Writing High-Quality Multiple-Choice Questions at Northern Border University (NBU) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA)
Anshoo Agarwal, Osama Khattak, Safya Ebraheem Esmaeel, Eslam Fahmy, Naglaa Ahmed Bayomy, Syed Imran Mehmood, Hamza Mohamed, Abdulhakim Bawadekji, Fahad Abdullah J Alotibi, Malek Saad M Alanazi, Abeer Younes

TL;DR
This study examines how training workshops affect the ability of university faculty to create high-quality multiple-choice questions for medical education.
Contribution
The study introduces a faculty development training workshop model to improve MCQ construction skills in medical education.
Findings
83.2% of faculty believed the workshop could reduce MCQ construction errors.
Participants agreed that multiple workshops are needed for lasting improvements in MCQ construction.
Short, one-day workshops alone are insufficient for achieving training objectives in MCQ writing.
Abstract
Background: A multiple-choice question (MCQ) is a frequently used assessment tool in medical education for both certification and competitive examinations. Well-constructed MCQs impact the utility of the assessment and, thus, the fate of the examinee. Aims and objectives: To analyze the basic science faculty perceptions of writing high-quality MCQs, to create awareness of item-writing flaws in constructing high-quality MCQs, and to determine the impact of faculty development training workshops (FDTWs) on MCQ writing skills. Material and methods: An online workshop was held over two weeks for basic science faculty to learn high-quality MCQ construction. Faculty-made MCQs were analyzed for flaws, and a questionnaire assessed the impact of the workshop on MCQ construction. Pre- and post-workshop responses were compared to evaluate the necessity of such workshops for improving faculty…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEducation and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
