Effect of lung volume preservation during spontaneous breathing trial on successful extubation in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: protocol for a multicenter clinical trial
Carles Subirà, Gina Rognoni, Herbert Baquerizo, Carolina García, Sara Cabañes, Maria de la Torre, Beatriz Quevedo, Cristina Pedrós, Ana I. Tizón, Natalia Murillo, Laura Parro, Fernando Eiras, Gemma Rialp, Susana Altaba, Alejandro González-Castro, Andrés F. Pacheco, Pablo Bayoumi

TL;DR
This study tests whether preserving lung volume during weaning from mechanical ventilation improves successful extubation outcomes in patients.
Contribution
The novel approach combines pressure-support ventilation with PEEP and avoids suctioning to preserve lung volume during extubation.
Findings
The trial will compare extubation success rates between standard and lung-volume-preservation weaning methods.
Ultrasound measurements will assess lung aeration and respiratory muscle changes before and after the trial.
Results may guide clinical decisions for high-risk patients by identifying the role of lung volume preservation.
Abstract
In standard weaning from mechanical ventilation, a successful spontaneous breathing test (SBT) consisting of 30 min 8 cmH2O pressure-support ventilation (PSV8) without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is followed by extubation with continuous suctioning; however, these practices might promote derecruitment. Evidence supports the feasibility and safety of extubation without suctioning. Ultrasound can assess lung aeration and respiratory muscles. We hypothesize that weaning aiming to preserve lung volume can yield higher rates of successful extubation. This multicenter superiority trial will randomly assign eligible patients to receive either standard weaning [SBT: 30-min PSV8 without PEEP followed by extubation with continuous suctioning] or lung-volume-preservation weaning [SBT: 30-min PSV8 + 5 cmH2O PEEP followed by extubation with positive pressure without suctioning]. We will…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRespiratory Support and Mechanisms · Airway Management and Intubation Techniques · Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
