Promoting long-acting reversible contraception among post-abortion clients with a provider-comparison intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial in Nepal
Jeremy Barofsky, Hannah Spring, Pragya Gartoulla, Raman Shrestha, Sabitri Sapkota, Elizabeth McElwee, Kathryn Church, Saugato Datta, Karina Livingston

TL;DR
A provider-comparison intervention in Nepal increased the use of long-acting reversible contraception among post-abortion clients by encouraging better counseling practices.
Contribution
A low-cost provider-level behavioral intervention using peer comparison significantly increased LARC uptake in post-abortion care.
Findings
The intervention increased LARC use by 6.6 percentage points compared to control clinics.
The effect of the intervention persisted after the formal experiment ended.
Provider counseling practices improved, and quality of care indicators remained stable or improved.
Abstract
Although long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is more effective and longer lasting than short-acting methods, uptake remains low among post-abortion clients. Using a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial, we evaluate the impact of a provider-level peer-comparison intervention to encourage choice of LARC in Nepal among post-abortion clients. The intervention used prominently displayed monthly posters comparing the health clinic’s previous month performance on LARC uptake against peer clinics. To understand how the intervention affected behavior, while ensuring voluntarism and informed choice, we used mystery client visits, in-depth provider interviews, and client exit survey data. The trial examined 17,680 post-abortion clients in 36 clinics in Nepal from July 2016 to January 2017. The primary outcome was the proportion of clients receiving LARCs. Statistical analysis used…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGlobal Maternal and Child Health · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
