Anaerobic Antibiotic Coverage in Aspiration Pneumonia and the Associated Benefits and Harms: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Anthony D. Bai, Siddhartha Srivastava, Geneviève C. Digby, Vincent Girard, Fahad Razak, Amol A. Verma

TL;DR
This study found that using antibiotics with extended anaerobic coverage for aspiration pneumonia does not reduce mortality and increases the risk of C. difficile colitis.
Contribution
The study provides evidence that extended anaerobic antibiotic coverage does not improve outcomes in aspiration pneumonia and may increase C. difficile risk.
Findings
Extended anaerobic coverage antibiotics did not reduce in-hospital mortality compared to limited coverage.
Extended anaerobic coverage was associated with a higher risk of Clostridioides difficile colitis.
Propensity score analysis confirmed no significant mortality benefit from extended coverage.
Abstract
Antibiotics with extended anaerobic coverage are used commonly to treat aspiration pneumonia, which is not recommended by current guidelines. In patients admitted to hospital for community-acquired aspiration pneumonia, does a difference exist between antibiotic therapy with limited anaerobic coverage (LAC) vs antibiotic therapy with extended anaerobic coverage (EAC) in terms of in-hospital mortality and risk of Clostridioides difficile colitis? We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study across 18 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2022. Patients were included if the physician diagnosed aspiration pneumonia and prescribed guideline-concordant first-line community-acquired pneumonia parenteral antibiotic therapy to the patient within 48 h of admission. Patients then were categorized into the LAC group if they received ceftriaxone, cefotaxime,…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear and radioactivity studies · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
