# In Vitro Cone Beam CT Analysis of the Efficacy of Three Supplementary Steps In the Removal of Obturation Material in Endodontic Retreatment

## TL;DR

This study compared three methods for removing leftover filling material from root canals after retreatment, finding that XP-endo Finisher R and passive ultrasonic irrigation worked better than EDDY.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel in vitro comparison of three supplementary techniques for root canal obturation removal using cone beam CT.

## Key findings

- XP-endo Finisher R had the lowest residual obturation material (1.6 mm³).
- EDDY showed the least efficiency with 3.6 mm³ residual material.
- Neither method completely removed all obturation material.

## Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of XP-endo Finisher R (FKG Dentaire, Le Locle, Neuchatel, Switzerland), EDDY (VDW Dental, Munich, Germany), and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) as supplementary steps following the D-RaCe retreatment file system (FKG Dentaire) in the removal of root canal obturation material using cone beam CT.

Materials and methods: A total of 45 two-rooted permanent maxillary first premolars were selected. Following access preparation, cleaning, and shaping with Hero Shaper (Micro Mega, Besançon, BFC, France) rotary file up to 25/04%, thermoplasticized obturation was performed with TotalFill BC sealer (FKG Dentaire) and gutta-percha. The specimens were subjected to routine retreatment using the D-RaCe retreatment file system. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and volumetric analysis were performed before and after this procedure. The samples were divided into group A (XP-endo Finisher R: n=15), group B (EDDY: n=15), and group C (PUI: n=15). Finally, a third CBCT was taken and a volumetric analysis was done. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS Statistics version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results: The lowest mean residual volume of obturation material was seen with XP-endo Finisher R (1.6 mm3), followed by PUI (1.7 mm3). The EDDY showed the least efficiency in complete debridement of the root canals (3.6 mm3). This difference in values was statistically significant.

Conclusion: The XP-endo Finisher R and PUI showed superior performance than EDDY in the removal of remaining obturation material from the root canal system after retreatment with the D-RaCe retreatment file system. However, none of the systems were able to completely remove the root canal obturation materials.