# Comment on Martínez-Delgado et al. Using Absorption Models for Insulin and Carbohydrates and Deep Leaning to Improve Glucose Level Predictions. Sensors 2021, 21, 5273

**Authors:** Josiah Z. R. Misplon, Varun Saini, Brianna P. Sloves, Sarah H. Meerts, David R. Musicant

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/s24134361 · Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024-07-05

## TL;DR

This paper critiques a flawed study on predicting blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes, showing its methods were invalid and results misleading.

## Contribution

The paper identifies and corrects a critical flaw in the validation scheme of a prior glucose prediction study.

## Key findings

- The original study's reported RMSE was invalid due to mixed training and test data.
- Corrected measurements showed the models performed no better than a naive prediction model.

## Abstract

The paper “Using Absorption Models for Insulin and Carbohydrates and Deep Leaning to Improve Glucose Level Predictions” (Sensors 2021, 21, 5273) proposes a novel approach to predicting blood glucose levels for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). By building exponential models from raw carbohydrate and insulin data to simulate the absorption in the body, the authors reported a reduction in their model’s root-mean-square error (RMSE) from 15.5 mg/dL (raw) to 9.2 mg/dL (exponential) when predicting blood glucose levels one hour into the future. In this comment, we demonstrate that the experimental techniques used in that paper are flawed, which invalidates its results and conclusions. Specifically, after reviewing the authors’ code, we found that the model validation scheme was malformed, namely, the training and test data from the same time intervals were mixed. This means that the reported RMSE numbers in the referenced paper did not accurately measure the predictive capabilities of the approaches that were presented. We repaired the measurement technique by appropriately isolating the training and test data, and we discovered that their models actually performed dramatically worse than was reported in the paper. In fact, the models presented in the that paper do not appear to perform any better than a naive model that predicts future glucose levels to be the same as the current ones.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** type 1 diabetes mellitus (MONDO:0005147)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** INS (insulin) [NCBI Gene 3630] {aka IDDM, IDDM1, IDDM2, ILPR, IRDN, MODY10}
- **Diseases:** T1DM (MESH:D003922)
- **Chemicals:** blood glucose (MESH:D001786), Glucose (MESH:D005947), Carbohydrates (MESH:D002241)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11244369/full.md

## References

11 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11244369/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11244369