Comparative Study of Physicochemical Properties and Antibacterial Potential of Cyanobacteria Spirulina platensis-Derived and Chemically Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles
Ani Harutyunyan, Liana Gabrielyan, Anush Aghajanyan, Susanna Gevorgyan, Robin Schubert, Christian Betzel, Wojciech Kujawski, Lilit Gabrielyan

TL;DR
This study compares silver nanoparticles made from cyanobacteria and chemically, finding the former more stable and effective against bacteria.
Contribution
Demonstrates the antibacterial efficacy and stability of Spirulina platensis-derived silver nanoparticles compared to chemically synthesized ones.
Findings
Splat-AgNPs are spherical and stable with a zeta-potential of -50.0 mV, while Chem-AgNPs are irregular and larger.
Splat-AgNPs show stronger bactericidal activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
Splat-AgNPs disrupt bacterial membrane permeability and H+-fluxes via FoF1-ATPase.
Abstract
The “green synthesis” of nanoparticles (NPs) offers cost-effective and environmentally friendly advantages over chemical synthesis by utilizing biological sources such as bacteria, algae, fungi, or plants. In this context, cyanobacteria and their components are valuable sources to produce various NPs. The present study describes the comparative analysis of physicochemical and antibacterial properties of chemically synthesized (Chem-AgNPs) and cyanobacteria Spirulina platensis-derived silver NPs (Splat-AgNPs). The physicochemical characterization applying complementary dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy revealed that Splat-AgNPs have an average hydrodynamic radius of ∼ 28.70 nm and spherical morphology, whereas Chem-AgNPs are irregular-shaped with an average radius size of ∼ 53.88 nm. The X-ray diffraction pattern of Splat-AgNPs confirms the formation of…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsUnderground infrastructure and sustainability · Construction Engineering and Safety · Risk and Safety Analysis
