# Worldwide variations in COVID-19 vaccination policies and practices in liver transplant settings: results of a multi-society global survey

**Authors:** Tommaso Di Maira, Carmen Vinaixa, Manhal Izzy, Francesco Paolo Russo, Varvara A. Kirchner, Ashwin Rammohan, Luca Saverio Belli, Wojciech Grzegorz Polak, Thomas Berg, Marina Berenguer

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1332616 · Frontiers in Transplantation · 2024-01-19

## TL;DR

A global survey of liver transplant centers shows varied vaccination policies for COVID-19, with mRNA vaccines being widely used and generally safe.

## Contribution

The study provides the first global assessment of vaccination policies and practices for liver transplant patients.

## Key findings

- Most liver transplant centers prioritize vaccine access for patients and healthcare workers.
- mRNA vaccines showed a favorable safety profile with fewer side effects compared to other types.
- Only a small percentage of centers modified immunosuppression post-vaccination.

## Abstract

Despite the WHO's report of 24 available SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, limited data exist regarding vaccination policies for liver transplant (LT) patients. To address this, we conducted a global multi-society survey (EASL-ESOT-ELITA-ILTS) in LT centers.

A digital questionnaire assessing vaccine policies, safety, efficacy, and center data was administered online to LT centers.

Out of 168 responding centers, 46.4%, 28%, 13.1%, 10.7%, and 1.8% were from European, American, Western Pacific, Southeast Asian, and Eastern Mediterranean Regions. Most LT centers prioritized COVID-19 vaccine access for LT patients (76%) and healthcare workers (86%), while other categories had lower priority (30%). One-third of responders recommended mRNA vaccine exclusively, while booster doses were widely recommended (81%). One-third conducted post-vaccine liver function tests post COVID-19 vaccine. Only 16% of centers modified immunosuppression, and mycophenolate discontinuation or modification was the main approach. Side effects were seen in 1 in 1,000 vaccinated patients, with thromboembolism, acute rejection, and allergic reaction being the most severe. mRNA showed fewer side effects (−3.1, p = 0.002).

COVID-19 vaccines and booster doses were widely used among LT recipients and healthcare workers, without a specific vaccine preference. Preventative immunosuppression adjustment post-vaccination was uncommon. mRNA vaccines demonstrated a favorable safety profile in this population.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** SARS-CoV-2 (MONDO:0100096), COVID-19 (MONDO:0100096)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), thromboembolism (MESH:D013923), allergic reaction (MESH:D004342)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (no rank) [taxon 2697049]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11235330/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11235330/full.md

## References

20 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11235330/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11235330