Editorial: Ex vivo graft preservation and modification
David Al-Adra, Constanca Figueiredo, Nicco Krezdorn

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes · Organ Donation and Transplantation · Liver Disease and Transplantation
Editorial on the Research Topic Ex-vivo graft preservation and modification
Organ transplantation is the best treatment for end-stage organ disease. However, the demand for suitable organs for transplant outweighs the supply, which has led to the expansion of the donor pool using marginal quality organs (1). With respect to kidneys, marginal organs may carry higher risks, but they have been shown to be better for patients than dialysis (2, 3). To mitigate the risks associated with marginal organs ex vivo machine perfusion has been implemented for a variety of solid organs (4–6). Variations on ex vivo perfusion technology have extended donor organ cold ischemia time, allowed for organ assessment, and opened the possibility of organ rehabilitation with drug-, cell-, or gene-therapy. As such, these perfusion platforms may allow therapies for the reduction of ischemia-reperfusion injury and attenuation of allo- or xenogeneic immunogenicity. Therefore, this Research Topic aims to showcase state-of-the-art techniques in ex vivo organ preservation and modification.
Vargas et al. begin the Research Topic with a review summarizing the rapidly advancing field of ex vivo perfusion technology with respect to the liver. This review discusses immunomodulation, gene therapy and pharmacotherapy to modify a liver graft prior to transplant using ex vivo perfusion. Although organ preservation via ex vivo perfusion systems is promising, this manuscript concludes by reflecting on the many steps still to overcome prior to the translation of these experimental ex vivo techniques to the clinical setting. One such clinical obstacle is determining the optimal oxygen carrier to supply adequate tissue oxygenation to meet the physiological metabolic demand of ex vivo perfusion when conducted at normothermic temperatures. To this end, Rother et al. studied the effects of three different oxygen carriers on porcine kidneys undergoing normothermic ex vivo perfusion. Using the Kidney Assist® device, the authors show similar kidney tissue integrity between oxygen carriers. However, using real-time polymerase chain reaction and Luminex techniques, the authors also show lower immunogenicity of the kidney after perfusion with all synthetic oxygen carriers vs. red blood cells. Similar to our recent findings in the liver, these results suggest alternative oxygen carriers to red blood cells are effective, may be more available, and have immunological advantages over packed red blood cells (7). Furthermore, Hofmann et al. presented an overview on the potential of using human amniotic membrane (hAM)-derivatives in decreasing immunogenicity and supporting tissue regeneration.
In addition to prolonging organ storage and offering functional assessment, one of the most exciting aspects of ex vivo perfusion is the unique advantage of being able to deliver therapeutics directly to the organ. However, not all ex vivo modifications require perfusion. In the study by Gao et al. recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) is used to transduce rat livers with the firefly luciferase gene while undergoing cold storage. After syngeneic liver transplantation, control animals demonstrated no bioluminescent activity, while animals receiving rAAV-treated livers demonstrated gene expression based on bioluminescence and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Taken together, these results show the effectiveness of rAAV mediated gene transduction in liver grafts when administered during cold storage.
Contained withing this Research Topic, we have demonstrated the latest techniques of ex vivo graft preservation and modification. Future studies will continue to expand the use of ex vivo perfusion and modification to expand the use of marginal organs for transplantation.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Schladt DP Israni AK. OPTN/SRTR 2021 annual data report: introduction. Am J Transplant. (2023) 23(2 Suppl 1):S 12–20. 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.02.00337132351 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Sharma N Mahajan A Qazi YA. Marginal kidney transplantation: the road less traveled. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. (2019) 24(1):92–6. 10.1097/MOT.000000000000060330507708 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Jay CL Washburn K Dean PG Helmick RA Pugh JA Stegall MD. Survival benefit in older patients associated with earlier transplant with high KDPI kidneys. Transplantation. (2017) 101(4):867–72. 10.1097/TP.000000000000140527495758 PMC 5292097 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Nasralla D Coussios CC Mergental H Akhtar MZ Butler AJ Ceresa CDL A randomized trial of normothermic preservation in liver transplantation. Nature. (2018) 557(7703):50–6. 10.1038/s 41586-018-0047-929670285 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Hosgood SA Callaghan CJ Wilson CH Smith L Mullings J Mehew J Normothermic machine perfusion versus static cold storage in donation after circulatory death kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial. Nat Med. (2023) 29(6):1511–9. 10.1038/s 41591-023-02376-737231075 PMC 10287561 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Divithotawela C Cypel M Martinu T Singer LG Binnie M Chow CW Long-term outcomes of lung transplant with ex vivo lung perfusion. JAMA Surg. (2019) 154(12):1143–50. 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.407931596484 PMC 6802423 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Jennings H Carlson KN Little C Verhagen JC Nagendran J Liu Y The immunological effect of oxygen carriers on normothermic ex vivo liver perfusion. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:833243. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.83324335812402 PMC 9258194 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
