The relationship between community food environment around schools and student meal participation: the role of school CEP participation status

TL;DR

This study explores how the food environment near schools affects student meal participation, especially in schools that offer free meals to all students.

Contribution

The study reveals that the impact of the local food environment on breakfast participation varies by school type and CEP participation status.

Findings

School breakfast participation was 4% lower in high-density unhealthy food environments among non-CEP schools.

Middle/high schools not in CEP showed a 10% lower breakfast participation in high-density food environments.

CEP-participating schools showed no difference in breakfast participation based on the food environment.

Abstract

Despite the many benefits of school meals, not all students participate. One reason students may not participate in school meals is because they instead purchase breakfast or lunch from food outlets located around schools that mostly carry unhealthy items. This study examined whether school participation in the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP), which allows qualifying schools to serve free meals to all students, moderated the association between the community food environment around schools and student meal participation.

This study employed a longitudinal repeated-measures design using school-level data collected between 2014 and 2020 within four low-income school districts (n = 126 schools) in the US. We obtained meal participation data from state records and created a measure characterizing the community food environment within 0.25 miles of schools (characterized as low-density of unhealthy food outlets vs. high-density of unhealthy food outlets) through a latent class analysis. Regression analysis estimated associations between community food environments, CEP participation, and participation rates in school breakfast and school lunch, assessed in separate models.

While no moderating effect of school CEP status was observed for breakfast or lunch participation, school breakfast participation was predicted to be 4% lower in high-density food environments than in low-density environments (P-value = .049) among non-CEP schools, and there was no difference in participation by the community food environment among CEP-participating schools. Differences in breakfast participation by the community food environment among non-CEP schools were mostly attributable to middle/high schools, with participation predicted to be 10% lower in high-density environments than in low-density environments among non-CEP middle/high schools (P-value < .001), whereas such a difference in participation was not observed among non-CEP elementary schools.

Negative associations between food environment around schools and school breakfast participation were observed only among middle and high schools not participating in CEP, suggesting that policy actions to increase access to free school meals may benefit students, particularly older children and adolescents.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-024-03498-6.

Figures