# Impact of coronary collateralization on major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events after successful recanalization of chronic total occlusion

**Authors:** Yurong Sun, Bin Zhang, Xinyuan Zhang, Xiaojiao Zhang, Wenqi Bao, Hangrui Bai, Bo Luan

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1374398 · Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · 2024-06-25

## TL;DR

Poor coronary collateral circulation increases the risk of heart and brain complications in patients with blocked arteries, especially those with metabolic syndrome or diabetes.

## Contribution

This study identifies that poor coronary collateral circulation significantly increases adverse outcomes in CTO patients, particularly those with metabolic syndrome or diabetes.

## Key findings

- Poor CCC is associated with a 3.33-fold higher risk of MACCEs compared to good CCC.
- Patients with poor CCC and MetS have a 4.21-fold higher risk of MACCEs.
- Similar increased risks are observed in CTO patients with diabetes and a Syntax score ≥23.

## Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effects of coronary collateral circulation (CCC) on the prognosis of chronic total occlusion (CTO) patients with or without metabolic syndrome (MetS).

The study included 342 CTO patients who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention at the People's Hospital of Liaoning Province between 1 February 2021 and 30 September 2023. The Rentrop score was used to assess the status of CCC. The outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and non-fatal stroke. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were used to investigate the association of CCC, MetS, and MACCEs with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The effect of CCC was further investigated in different MetS, diabetes mellitus (DM), and Syntax score groups.

MACCEs were more common in patients with poor CCC compared to those with good CCC (38.74% vs. 16.56%). Statistical differences were found in MACCEs (OR = 3.33, 95% CI: 1.93–5.72), MI (OR = 3.11, 95% CI: 1.73–5.58), TVR (OR = 3.06, 95% CI: 1.70–5.53), and stent thrombosis (OR = 6.14, 95% CI: 2.76–13.65) between the good and poor CCC groups. Poor CCC patients with MetS had a higher incidence of MACCEs (OR = 4.21, 95% CI: 2.05–8.65), non-fatal MI (OR = 4.44, 95% CI: 2.01–9.83), TVR (OR = 3.28, 95% CI: 1.51–7.11), and stent thrombosis (OR = 10.80, 95% CI: 3.11–37.54). Similar findings were also observed in CTO patients with DM and a Syntax score ≥23.

Poor CCC could increase the risk of MACCEs in CTO patients, particularly those with MetS, DM, and a Syntax score ≥23. Further prospective, multicenter studies are needed to validate our findings and to explore potential therapeutic interventions.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** metabolic syndrome (MONDO:0000816), diabetes mellitus (MONDO:0005015), myocardial infarction (MONDO:0005068), stroke (MONDO:0005098)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** stent thrombosis (MESH:D013927), MetS (MESH:D024821), MI (MESH:D009203), DM (MESH:D003920), cardiovascular and cerebrovascular (MESH:D002318), cardiac death (MESH:D003643), CTO (MESH:D001157), stroke (MESH:D020521)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11231425/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11231425/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11231425/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11231425