# Impact of non-emergency surgical timing on postoperative recovery quality in mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected patients: a grouped cohort study

**Authors:** Qiu-Bo Wang, Yu-Long Wang, Yue-Feng Wang, Hua Chen, Wei Chen, Yong-Quan Chen

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02600-y · BMC Anesthesiology · 2024-07-06

## TL;DR

Surgery within 2 weeks of a mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to worse short-term recovery, but not long-term outcomes.

## Contribution

Shows that waiting more than 2 weeks before surgery improves short-term recovery in mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 patients.

## Key findings

- Surgery within 2 weeks of infection led to significantly lower short-term recovery scores and longer hospital stays.
- No significant differences in long-term recovery quality across the groups.
- Waiting more than 2 weeks before surgery is recommended to improve short-term recovery outcomes.

## Abstract

To explore the relationship between the timing of non-emergency surgery in mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infected individuals and the quality of postoperative recovery from the time of confirmed infection to the day of surgery.

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 300 cases of mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected patients undergoing elective general anaesthesia surgery at Yijishan Hospital between January 9, 2023, and February 17, 2023. Based on the time from confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection to the day of surgery, patients were divided into four groups: ≤2 weeks (Group A), 2–4 weeks (Group B), 4–6 weeks (Group C), and 6–8 weeks (Group D). The primary outcome measures included the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale scores at 3 days, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included postoperative mortality, ICU admission, pulmonary complications, postoperative length of hospital stay, extubation time, and time to leave the PACU.

Concerning the primary outcome measures, the QoR-15 scores at 3 days postoperatively in Group A were significantly lower compared to the other three groups (P < 0.05), while there were no statistically significant differences among the other three groups (P > 0.05). The QoR-15 scores at 3 and 6 months postoperatively showed no statistically significant differences among the four groups (P > 0.05). In terms of secondary outcome measures, Group A had a significantly prolonged hospital stay compared to the other three groups (P < 0.05), while other outcome measures showed no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05).

The timing of surgery in mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected patients does not affect long-term recovery quality but does impact short-term recovery quality, especially for elective general anaesthesia surgeries within 2 weeks of confirmed infection. Therefore, it is recommended to wait for a surgical timing of at least greater than 2 weeks to improve short-term recovery quality and enhance patient prognosis.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** SARS-CoV-2 (MONDO:0100096)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** SARS-CoV-2 infected (MESH:D000086382), infection (MESH:D007239), pulmonary complications (MESH:D008171)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11227204/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11227204/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11227204/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11227204